Highly untechnical Scrapebox tip

partymarty4870

Elite Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
2,032
Reaction score
1,697
When doing a large blogposting session split the results into failed and posted. then run the same task on all failed url's. Then split the results into posted and failed. then run the same task on the 2nd failed url list.

I've been getting about 13% to post successfully 1st rerun and about 4% success on the 2nd rerun.

this knocks 20% off the failed list which can be literally hours and hours once they are given to the slow poster.

Very simple - very untechnical tip, that took me about 6 months to work out.
 
Just bought SB, so thanks for this, you saved me 6 months! lol
 
Tips like this are the ones where you ask yourself "why didn't I think of that?". Thanks for sharing :)
 
so basically u dont need slow poster option, just re-post them using fast poster and u get more successfull rate?

regards
 
I did this from the first time, but I wonder what is the explication for the fact that the comments didn't work for the first time
 
I did this from the first time, but I wonder what is the explication for the fact that the comments didn't work for the first time

I find it is usually that the site is temporarily down or something of that nature. I mean if you are spamming 10,000 sites inevitably a few will be down when trying to access them. Down for maintenance or a sever error on their side.
 
This is what I am doing, specially when collecting auto approved blogs.
 
I think sweet funny should add "auto retry" failed so we dont have to export failed/posted etc. Would make the work more easier.
 
Yeah, Sweetfunny, do take not. Autoretry function would be good.
 
Um.. i have already posted this as a suggestion in a post I made about 2 days ago I do it about 3 times and suggestted to do retrys with what ever number a user selects so if you selected 5 it would run through failed lists 5 times etc.. Its because proxies or sites may be down for a moment...
 
I been doing this from day 1 too, but not the same way as badman1 said. Im trying your version now.
 
I've done this before. I have a much better success rate than you do though(are you using private or public proxies?).

I usually get about 35% success the first run and 15% success the second.
 
Back
Top