Hey GSA SER Users - Can you do without UD, SeNuke, Licorne AIO, etc?

Hey all, I just started using GSA SER and am thinking of getting Ultimate Demon (UD) or Licorne AIO.

The question is, do I really need UD or Licorne?

Most of the discussions in the past has often said that GSA is for Tier 2 while UD, Senuke, and Licorne are better suited for Tier 1.

But with SERengine subscription, it seems GSA SER can do about the same as those other link building tools, give or take.

What significant advantages that those other tools still have over GSA SER + SERengines, that would justified purchasing a license for them.

The only real advantages that those other tools have over GSA SER (from my observation) is

1. more user-friendly interface
2. step-by-step wizards
3. site diagram wizard ( Senuke and Licorne, but I don't think UD has this feature ) to create multi-tier campaigns
4. built-in static site list for high PR Web 2.0 platforms like WordPress

But these features tend to be more aesthetic as well as convenience than functional advantages.

Any advice here is to why I should still purchase UD or Licorne AIO despite already having GSA SER? (I'm not considering Senuke or Magic Submitter or any other $100+ a month subscription tool. That's just insane IMO). What is wrong with these people by the way for charging $167 dollars a month?? At first glance, I thought it was a typo and figured it was $16 a month but after washing my eyes out, it really is $167 a month.

Thanks!

get a fcs network instead, tried magic + senuke + UD, all suck in my opinion.

The only drawback of GSA SER is that it can't post to web 2.0s, and serengines is not that good, i haven't tested it intensively, but it is quite discouraging.

FCS networker has a very high rate of success in term of creating web 2.0s, you should give them a try.

I haven't subscribe to SERengines yet. Can I ask what is not good with it? (high failure rate, crashes, difficult to configure, etc.?) I do see that it only has 28 web 2.0 platforms, maybe that's enough I don't know.

MajesticSEO said:

I haven't subscribe to SERengines yet. Can I ask what is not good with it? (high failure rate, crashes, difficult to configure, etc.?) I do see that it only has 28 web 2.0 platforms, maybe that's enough I don't know.

Click to expand...

Well low success rate is what i encountered, seriously, we really don't have time to spoon feed it all day and checking at logs because there is better alternative such as FCS networker.

The updates to GSA SER and CB are constant which by itself is a good enough to get the job done with good target lists you can get your hands on