I'm getting more and more confused (and worried) by this.
First, there's a poll asking people how much they would pay. Then there's an 'announcement' that it needs to be limited so it'll be priced high anyway. So, why bother with the poll?
And, Rob the Builder makes some excellent points about promises and content. The only thing I've seen mentioned so far is the cookie script running on a thin client basis. That means that rather than paying a one off fee (which some people have already done) you will be locked into membership for as long as you want to use it - or any other things which come along.
Sorry, but I don't run my business by putting it into the hands of others - no matter how nice they are.
Some of the people posting that they will pay really high monthly money seem to me to be exactly the wrong kind of people to let loose on this sort of stuff because they simply aren't acting in a business like manner. They give the impression of people who will buy absolutely anything which says it's going to make them successful - when they don't know what it is. And, read all the posts again - there is NO detail of anything other than the cookie script.
I'm sorry to sound so negative but this needs a lot more information, not just vague promises.
That's understandable I forgot to mention that their are certain server requirements for the server. Anywaysl the good thing about the new server side script is that there is nothing to install. You just simply copy and paste some code into your website and your off stuffing
I think that if this happens, you just need a monthly subscription section. That's all. I make money now, probably better than most people online, but not a fortune, but quite frankly, I don't think I have the expertise to use a tool that has a monthly fee attached. I've been a member of SEC, YACG and SSEC, and I still don't have it all down to warrant me paying extra every month if I'm not going to get something back for my efforts.
I don't mind the donor contributions, because I've learned more from the materials I got through the VIP section than I learned scouring the web. But I've also noticed, whether it's SSEC, YACG or whatever, there are people that make and lose money. For now, I'll probably just stay on the outside, experiment and learn.
I think you've got to make the price high. I'm voting for $50.
Exactly --So will this mean that sites created will be dependent on/call back to your server? = if someone discontinues membership their sites will stop working?
$19.95 doesn't seem excessive. However, at present there's a lot of sharing of stuff here on a free basis. If that goes then, I'm afraid, so does the whole forum because an awful lot of people will simply find somewhere else. Memberships have a habit of falling off. One or two poor months where there's little or no new content and all of a sudden there's nobody left.
I'd suggest that a) you keep stuff here totally as it is and b) charge for VIP area access. Access to that area would be by monthly fee or, perhaps, bestowed upon individuals who contribute important stuff on the main forum. Perhaps you could 'value' such contributions and give VIP access for a proportionate period of time.
That way you have an income stream from those who always want the latest and greatest and a potential income stream from those who either can't afford a regular membership fee or will pay only for demonstrable value.
I have to admit that I've found some good stuff here - but I've also been able to find good stuff elsewhere and it hasn't cost me anything. You'd be very hard put to entice me to pay more than 20 bucks.
I think this poll is kind of pointless. 98% of the people here are going to vote for the cheapest option possible... If we set the price at 1 penny, it would still dominate the polls.
I have to agree with DaKnightFall on this, like I said in a previous post in this thread, I voted $19.95 because I am a cheap bastard an would rather get something for nothing, but, I am wise enough to know that life does not work that way. Am I willing to pay more, yes, but that was not the question.
hah, no - i think there going to vote on the lest amount because they want to make money with out spending it![]()