Has removing backlinks ever improved your rankings?

GeeLark AI

Elite Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2018
Messages
5,090
Reaction score
2,962
some have reported positive results from link pruning.

Have you tested this approach and observed measurable improvements, or were the changes negligible?
 
Never seen or heard of this.
If the links are bad google will de-index those pages on its own anyway.
 
When you remove truly toxic or irrelevant links, link pruning can help, but the impact is usually small or neutral.
 
when I have tested link pruning, improvements were measurable only when removing toxic or spam backlinks, while sites with mostly natural links see negligible to neutral impact.
 
I’ve seen rankings get better after removing low-quality links that were hurting trust.
 
Yes removing toxic or low-quality backlinks can improve rankings, especially if Google previously saw them as spammy. The impact is usually noticeable when the site has a cleaner, more natural link profile afterward.
 
yes, I’ve seen it work a few times. when a site had a bunch of spammy or irrelevant backlinks, cleaning them up and disavowing the worst ones actually led to noticeable ranking improvements after a few weeks. on sites with mostly clean backlinks, though, removing links didn’t make much difference. so it really depends on the quality of the links you’re pruning.
 
disavow for "spam" links is 2015 mentality . google ignores classic spam automatically .

the only real reason to prune links in '25 is to fix Topic Dilution .

if u have a crypto site but ur backlink profile is 80% mommy blogs (from cheap pbn) or adult stuff , ur semantic vector gets blurry . google gets confused about ur entity category .

pruning those "off-topic" links (even if high DA) sharpens the topical relevance . try removing non-relevant but "clean" links , watch rankings jump . spam doesnt matter , relevance does .
 
cleaning up toxic backlinks sometimes gives a noticeable boost, but if the links were decent, removing them usually does nothing
 
I’ve tested it a couple of times. In some cases it helped a bit, especially when there were a lot of low quality links, but it wasn’t a magic fix. More of a cleanup than a growth lever, Good luck!!!
 
I’ve tested link pruning a few times and it can help, but only when there’s clear low-quality or toxic links dragging things down. If the backlink profile is already clean, the impact is usually minimal it’s more of a cleanup move than a growth strategy.
 
Yes, that can work, but it's better to let them be and let the algo do it's job
 
Seen lots of people claim it, have not experienced it myself.
 
Yes, I’ve seen improvements after removing spammy or irrelevant links sometimes cleaning up bad signals helps Google trust the site again.
 
In my experience, pruning the links only yields results when there is a clear quality issue; otherwise, the benefits are quite minimal.
 
Yes, in some cases removing or disavowing low-quality or irrelevant backlinks can help stabilize or improve rankings. It usually works when links are clearly harming trust, not as a general growth tactic.
 
some have reported positive results from link pruning.

Have you tested this approach and observed measurable improvements, or were the changes negligible?
Yes, link pruning usually gives measurable improvements, but results depend on the site and link quality.
 
Yes—removing toxic or irrelevant backlinks can improve rankings, because Google may downgrade sites with spammy or manipulative links.
 
Back
Top