Harder Hitting SEO

Rnking

Registered Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2023
Messages
93
Reaction score
22
I've seen posts recently relating to seeing results through Harder Hitting SEO. It's been referred to as "Rapid SEO".

I mean of course it makes sense, more content = more results.

Do people recommend writing 2-3 articles per day as opposed to a few per week?

Or do people dripfeed content? Looking to see content based results faster so more makes sense but wanted to check.
 
Google recently said that there is no benefit to drip feeding content and that you can literally dump thousands of articles on day one without issue.

Now, let's be real here; Google are damn liars, they never tell the truth about what they are doing and what is good or bad SEO. You should never take what they say on face value and always question what they say. I have never found a huge dump of content to be as good in the long run for SEO than drip feeding content.

Personally I wouldn't consider 2-3 posts a day to be dumping content, in some spaces that is drip feeding. If you have the content to post 2-3 a day you should do that.
 
Google recently said that there is no benefit to drip feeding content and that you can literally dump thousands of articles on day one without issue.

Now, let's be real here; Google are damn liars, they never tell the truth about what they are doing and what is good or bad SEO. You should never take what they say on face value and always question what they say. I have never found a huge dump of content to be as good in the long run for SEO than drip feeding content.

Personally I wouldn't consider 2-3 posts a day to be dumping content, in some spaces that is drip feeding. If you have the content to post 2-3 a day you should do that.
Thanks for your reply.

We have a list of keywords basically, thousands of them. All lower difficulty stuff but we are writing a few articles a week, maybe 2 a day some days and the results are coming but trickling in.

I read on Linkedin about hitting harder and mass-producing content at a much bigger scale. Upwards of 3 articles per day, every day.
 
Google recently said that there is no benefit to drip feeding content and that you can literally dump thousands of articles on day one without issue.

Now, let's be real here; Google are damn liars, they never tell the truth about what they are doing and what is good or bad SEO. You should never take what they say on face value and always question what they say. I have never found a huge dump of content to be as good in the long run for SEO than drip feeding content.

Personally I wouldn't consider 2-3 posts a day to be dumping content, in some spaces that is drip feeding. If you have the content to post 2-3 a day you should do that.

Exactly

Sincerely,
The Data Scientist
 
Back
Top