gtmetrix is stupid

I'll add another fun secret. This is the absolutely fun tip about noth google site speed tool and GT matrix

1. Run site to speed test

check the results

2. stay 1 minute

3. Run the same website again

You'll see the miracle. lol. :D
 
I'll add another fun secret. This is the absolutely fun tip about noth google site speed tool and GT matrix

1. Run site to speed test

check the results

2. stay 1 minute

3. Run the same website again

You'll see the miracle. lol. :D
The score changes right? If so, that's kinda expected. It should have to do more with the server response than the tool. The server may sometimes take more time to respond. Even GPS says that on the result page. ;)
 
The score changes right? If so, that's kinda expected. It should have to do more with the server response than the tool. The server may sometimes take more time to respond. Even GPS says that on the result page. ;)


And also don't use these both tools my friend. These are too old now. Use this one for future projects. The future is here.

http://web.dev/.
 
The results of the GTMetrix often change every re-run. There is no consistency, unlike google pagespeed.
 
What if Google page speed sucks

This? A
Any reason why you trust ps over gt? Google usually don’t give a shit if one of their tools is a bit half assed. Gt on the hand will likely rely greatly on the reputation of their app.
 
This? A
Any reason why you trust ps over gt? Google usually don’t give a shit if one of their tools is a bit half assed. Gt on the hand will likely rely greatly on the reputation of their app.
You can bash them as much as you want, but the fact is that their score is damn accurate; and they show you why something is wrong. It's upto you to use them, or any other tool like YSlow. The point of this thread was not to praise GPS but to point out that gtmetrix sucks.
 
You can bash them as much as you want, but the fact is that their score is damn accurate; and they show you why something is wrong. It's upto you to use them, or any other tool like YSlow. The point of this thread was not to praise GPS but to point out that gtmetrix sucks.
But how do you verify they are more accurate than gt?
 
But how do you verify they are more accurate than gt?
I can tell, coz I have about 12 years of experience in this field, i.e. Web Development. :/
 
Really wish the PageSpeed Insights have a function allowing us to block all ads on the site.

Some funny things I can point out that put my site at a low grade:
  • There is a video in my article, which loads the base.js file from Youtube server.
  • My Adsense Ads are not optimized.
  • Using Google Fonts.
 
Really wish the PageSpeed Insights have a function allowing us to block all ads on the site.

Some funny things I can point out that put my site at a low grade:
  • There is a video in my article, which loads the base.js file from Youtube server.
  • My Adsense Ads are not optimized.
  • Using Google Fonts.
Or, you could probably defer the ad scripts to load after window has loaded? That should be better for UX as well, I think. :)
 
You'll see the miracle. lol. :D
The results of the GTMetrix often change every re-run. There is no consistency, unlike google pagespeed.

Ofcourse it changes on a re-run, dns caches and so on is up to date suddenly near the test point after first run.

I use GTmetrix, web.dev and Pingdom in my job, done so for years, no problem, they measure differently in their own way, just need to learn them.
 
just ran my wordpress site on both GTmetric and Google Page Speed and both results 100%... how is that possible?
 
just ran my wordpress site on both GTmetric and Google Page Speed and both results 100%... how is that possible?
If you PM me the site, I can check. But not today hehe.
 
Back
Top