Sorry but i'll pass on the trial.
And by the way, CB Stats are NOT over inflated, those are the stats at the time the captchas were created and put in to CB. As you know, Captchas are updated all the time and unless every single one, umm over 900 captchas currently in CB, was updated every week, nothing will change on the stats of their own solve rates.
I update and add my own captchas to CB, so I know how all those stats work.
I would think that you for one would know this, seeing as you also have a captcha solve software and i'm sure that your solve rates for every single captcha your software solves is not a real time stats.
So I would really appreciate, and many others as well I would hope, if you would stop bashing CB and saying that it's an inferior software or a more expensive knock off of yours and just deal with the fact that CB has taken over OCR captcha software. Either time to move on or bring yours up to speed and maybe market your software a little better.
I sell SER lists and you don't see me jumping in to threads knocking down other list sellers. Grow up man. Enough is enough.
Dont embarass yourself since you have absolutely no knowlege of what you're talking about. Yes, they are way over-inflated as I have already shown.
Ill go ahead and let the cat out of the bag and I am sure this will result in a new version with this being fixed .. but here goes ... I hope this isnt over your head ... its actually quite simple.
You load a new captcha type into CB and you provide say ... 10-25 samples.
You develop a kick-ass algorithm that solve these 10-25 samples at X%
Done ... right?
Nope.
Now test that same algorithm against 100 samples ... guess what X% is very likely to be lower and sometimes MUCH lower than your orginal ssuccess rate. Why???? Its simple ... 10-25 is not enough samples develop an algorithm on. It has ZERO to do with what you are claiming above. Captchas are RARELY updated .... wow man you are so off base here it IS embarassing.
So yes, in a nut shell ... and I dont know if its laziness, lack of competancy or just not doing it long enough like I have, but CB develops their algorithms agains VERY SMALL sample sets, which ends up significantly overstating the success rate.
Prove me wrong Trevor ... guess what ... you cant. because I am right.
Now on to some details ... here are MORE examples of what I am talking about ... and once again ... PROVE ME WRONG ... I am waiting ....
[TABLE="width: 384"]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 64"][/TD]
[TD="width: 64"]Published[/TD]
[TD="width: 192, colspan: 3"]ACTUAL SUCCESS RATE[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Article Dashboard[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]80[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]36[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Article Script[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]30[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]12[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Article MS[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]96[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]55[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]DocuWiki[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]19[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]3[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]MediaWiki (Math)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]86[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]32[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]MediaWiki (ocr)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]70[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]0[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Open Realty[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]73[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]17[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]PRLog[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]48[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]26[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Question2Answer[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]30[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]13[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]ScrewTurn Wiki[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]99[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]35[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]TikiwWiki (complex)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]38[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]5[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 6"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]BlogEngine (blue)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]70[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]28[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]BlogEngine (complex)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]70[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]55[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]BlogSpot.es[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]57[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]22[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]ComDev[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]85[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]3[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FlatPress[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]20[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]2[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]KeywordLuv[/TD]
[TD]27-75[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]53[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Micolog[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]70[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]28[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]ModX[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]78[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]30[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Movable Type[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]70[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]41[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Serendipity[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]33[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]14[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Soapblox[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]46[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]20[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Weebly[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD="align: right"]67[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]47[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 6"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]AltoCMS-LiveStreet[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]5[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]0[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Joomla (QuickSilver)[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]100[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]75[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Dew-NewPHPLinks[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]50[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]31
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
CS develops our algorithms against 100 samples MINIMUM on every type.... this is Captcha Solving 101 ... and it simply has not been done in CB.
Ask ANY serious developer of OCR based captcha solving and they will agree 100% with what I am talking about..... In fact I just had this same discussion with Kelvin (name ring a bell) this morning.