ok so these are his final comments... i just got a few minutes back
again i quote topgun
"Seems that a lot of directories are rejecting the article due to its quality. And some are reporting of non valuable content to readers. I am sorry but i am not in control of this. If all these sites belong to me i would have approved all. What is left is these. These are all beyond my control. The quality of the article, if its original, new and insightful, they are most likely to keep it. I did my work on my end. Let me know if anything."
my comment "the article is 100% original and was written for this only. anyway i guess such is life. thank you"
*** additional comments which i did not send him. the article was custom written for this purpose and i am expert author at ezinearticles i know quality from quality. but i didnt say anything anyways. it could be 100 different things.
and his final reply to my above message.
"The is the common problem with article marketing. Unless you own the article sites, you do not have control over what gets approved, rejected. Thats why people still need Xrumer, SenukeX, Scrapebox and all other softwares to help them in the SEO game."
note: no mention of running the whatever little was approved through linklicious or anything.like he promised.
total list sent back to me with articles approved 95.
hope that helps.
