GPT tip for wordpress : it understands any shortcodes

The main ones I'm using are Shortcodes Ultimate(has a free version), WP Shortcode by MyThemeShop, "Intense" shortcodes. This BHW user @PremiumVault offers a plugin service that has all of these and a lot more: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/d...premiumvault-app.1571631/page-3#post-17624392 I only realized after paying like $30 for some of them.
In general, if your gonna use lots of plugins, get that or envato subscription, they even have Shortcodes Ultimate + unlimited site lincence which is a $60 a year value(and they offer unlimited licences even for the devs that don't offer than when you buy regularly, I shouldn't have paid $30 for the single site licenses)

Most of them have similar stuff, but some word better than others(most important to me are the tabbed boxes, and accordion style features). The "Intense" shortcodes plugin has ones with full width gradient of image fill divers and full screen video and some other elements you could make homepages with. Check the previews on the websites of each plugin(and load in the demo content), there's over 100 different short codes, some are pretty cool(combined the right way, can make nice designs and pretty complex rich content).

I tried others but some didn't work well(idk if theme compatibility issue, hosting server compatibility, or something else) and one caused a critical error. Btw, NameCheap by far has the best live support, they fixed the critical error on my site immediately, and I lost nothing. I am going to switch to a bigger cheaper hosting plan, but seriously, NameCheap will help you troubleshoot stuff that really isn't their problem(like the plugins)

______________________________________

Separately, and this one is important because I was so confused, I found a ChatGPT chat alternative to ChatGPT which you can use your GPT Turbo tokens(or other AI systems) for, just like ChatGPT, but with way higher limits. It's called Corcel. I can't tell yall how long it took for me to find that, you'd think it'd be obvious but I just couldn't find anything like it.

Just sign up for Corcel, and bam, same interphase as ChatGPT, but can use GPT4 Turbo and get 300 page outputs in the same type of interphase as ChatGPT.

I have an import plugin for blog posts(different from the one I was using for Woocommerce listings, but the same concept). I will create a simple blog format template including some shortcodes, so it's not just plain text blog post outputs, and will include some other features to the page like icon lists, yellow text highlights, call to action boxes with button, and columns and stuff - in addition to the regular article sections, and using information I paste in that I want it to use from other sites(the benefit over the autobloger). I can create a batch of 10 articles at a time with all the formatting, and paste into the spreadsheet along with page title, yoast page description, thumbnail image url, categories - and import them to the site. Also, the import plugin allows for custom post type, so I can use it for my wordpress themes that have custom post type for review pages with all the extra taxonomies and stuff for doing those in bulk.
___

I looked more into the Autoblogging platform suggested in this thread(aiautoblogger) and am going to start deploying it. It's not just a ridged output based on limited options, it's flexible, you can type and add in whatever you want to be included in each prompt, including extra instructions for affiliate link URLs to use, and a lot more. It shows examples for instructions for use of HTML, suggesting using basic things like bold and italics, but you can also include the instructions for short codes in there too, you aren't limited to HTML(anything chatgpt can do, you can configure that to automate for each article). It can include a F.A.Q. section of the article by just pasting in the short code format in there and providing instructs for the prompts. You could add additional information about different vendors or products(and say only include if relevant to this or that, basically can set conditions, so can have conditional outputs) as well as affiliate links for each, and you can also have it mention and link to other pages of your sites. You just have to be creative with that extra prompt info box. This is a lot better than the article writers with fixed settings, where it's there article style template or nothing.

I'm going to start using the autobloggin on a lot of my sites. Some of the sites I have I do not want to invest much time and effort, and just want them to be semi active(helps a lot with google, abandon a site a few months, and google may start ignoring it), so for some, I'll just prepare it for 50 outputs, 1 per week, and set them and forget it for a year. Also, will be better for my niche sites if I ever sell them. A few years active will be good, and it will be a step above typical autoblog content, as it will be enhanced with shortcodes, plus I'm good for writing the extra instructions for content. For $0.15 a week in tokens or whatever, well worth it. I will try a larger amount on some, but mostly want to keep it low cost and low maintenance as an addition to my primary content.

Only question is if they offer an unlimited site license or just 10. I'd really like to grow to 50 sites niche sites, and the smaller ones I'd just want like 1 post a week.
We are trying our best to make sure people are getting help from us. it feels good and satisfying when we see a person share details about us. hope we will able to add more value to this community.
 
IMO one of the most robust way of handling a large amount of sites not onply WP would be ubot studio, not cheap and with a learning curve but which allows granular approach.

The description of the tool sounds cool, and maybe it will be great in the near future, but right now I'm not ready to give control of my sites, my computer, etc. to an AI bot...

Watch this video to see why I doubt this.

 
Just wanted to share the format I'm using for blog posts. A little less spiffy than my product description set up, but not bad, better than plain text

Code:
<style>.container {max-width: 1200px;}</style>
<div class="container">
<span style="font-size: large;">
[st_text_color color="#000000"]

[wps_heading align="left" size="40" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Section 1 title[/wps_heading]
Intro paragraphs(1 to 3 paragraphs, depends on how well GPT is cooperating)
[wps_spacer size="20"]
[wps_content_slider style="light" animatein="slideInLeft" animateout="slideOutRight" autoplay="5" arrows="1" arrow_position="center" pagination="1" pagination_position="bottom-middle"]
[wps_content_slide]Fact1[/wps_content_slide]
[wps_content_slide]Fact2[/wps_content_slide]
[wps_content_slide]Fact1[/wps_content_slide]
[/wps_content_slider]

[wps_spacer size="20"]
[wps_heading align="left" size="40" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Section 2 title[/wps_heading]
1 to 3 paragraphs
[wps_spacer size="20"]
[wps_table style="hover-dark"]
<table>
<thead>
<tr class="ui-sortable">
<th class="wps-sort-row ui-sortable-handle">Table can be used for pros and cons, comparisons, and other info. GPT will add rows if needed and choose how to use the table, it's good at that. Sometimes data, sometimes definitions other categorized info</th>
<th class="wps-sort-row ui-sortable-handle">table title 2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>table content</td>
<td>table content</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>table content</td>
<td>table content</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
[/wps_table]

[wps_spacer size="20"]
[st_column size="8"]
[wps_heading align="left" size="40" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Section 3[/wps_heading]
2 paragraphs - diplayed on the left
[/st_column]
[st_column size="4"]
[wps_heading align="left" size="25" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Bullet Point Section title[/wps_heading]
[wps_lists icon="star" icon_color="#444"]
<ul>
<li>icon bullet point 1</li>
<li>icon bullet point 1</li>
<li>icon bullet point 1</li>
<li>icon bullet point 1 BTW, GPT apparently is familiar with typical naming systems for icon libraries and sometimes on it's own changes the icons in this shortcode to match a theme</li>
</ul>
[/wps_lists]
[/st_column]
[wps_spacer size="20"]

[wps_heading align="center" size="20" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)</wps_heading]
[wps_faq style="classic" question="question"]answer[/wps_faq]
[wps_faq style="classic" question="question"]answer[/wps_faq]
[wps_faq style="classic" question="question"]answer[/wps_faq]

[wps_spacer size="20"]
[wps_heading align="left" size="40" font_weight="normal" font_style="normal" margin="20"]Section Title[/wps_heading]
A few paragraphs
[/st_text_color]
</span>
</div>

If I remember correctly, at least most of these are shortcodes from the paid "inense" shortcode plugin

I use max width set by the code at the start since my blog section on my theme is set to full width, this looks better

Also, at the start and finish a text color shortcode(I know I can use HTML and CSS, but it seems to be simpler this way), and HTML for text size, since my theme defaults for the blog is grey tiny text(I know I could fix that by modifying the theme, but this is easy and looks fine).

I use the content slider towards the top, which is sorta filler, looks ok

I use the heading shortcodes instead of H2/H3 etc, looks better than my theme defaults

The collumn shortcode allows for a section to be 2/3 width with a 1/3 width bullet point section

The article template includes a shortcode for javascript F.A.Q.

Separately, I have GPT generate title(I use same for SEO title), yoast description, category suggestions(depends if I have existing categories, this is for a newer blog, when I don't want more categories, I can input that myself, or give GPT the list of categories and it'll include the right ones with outputs), tags, and you can have it do a snippet or short excerpt for the short description that shows on your site.

The plus is that it can do it in 1 output. Though even using API GPT models, it still struggles to keep content long, I keep telling it to keep it longer and more paragraphs, but inevitably it reverts to short paragraphs. My articles are based on sources I provide(I paste in a few article I want it to use to create my article with, it doesn't plagiarize at all, and it understands the topic - it doesn't just spin sentences), but the issue is that that seems to take up a lot of tokens when I provide my own info. I just use the playground version on the openapi site and spend tokens, as it seems to do a little better job than the subscription GPT4. Though some of the API models seem to be better than what I get from the subscription GPT4, like more natural writing to me.

Even on a 8,000 token API GPT model, it can't do any longer than this, and it'll stuggle if I ask it to make each section 3 paragraphs.(I was imagining the API GPT would be able to do 10 articles like this in one output, supposed to be up to 300 page outputs, but that's plain text, I can only get it to do this much, which is like 6-10 paragraphs and my shortcodes configured)

The nice thing is it's one output, and I can just paste it into a spreadsheet with the metadata(and do feature image separate, and put the URL for it in the spreadsheet, I could put file path and have it upload with the blog post import, but that's just as much work really)

It looks pretty good, but I want it to be able to do more. If anyone has a their own set up, please share. I'm trying to figure out how to get it to do bigger outputs, though it seems to spend tokens on processing the formatting.

I can ask GPT to do two outputs, the first with all the shortcode sections populated, and the second with just body paragraphs. It will remember the template, I can continue to just paste in 2-3 full articles, then it can do everything besides the body paragraphs - still faster than manually inputting the question and answers for F.A.Q. and the rest the shortcode sections, then I just tell it to "go on" and then it will do the paragraphs in a separate output, so that way I can get more like 15 paragraph articles - and then after that, I can just paste in a few articles for it to use for info and top for the next one and will start the next one with the same template(just have to be specific to do it in 2 separate outputs, and to pause after the first part, since it will start trying to do both parts in one output, but it will be more brief.

I think I will do the 2 output method for now, so it does more paragraphs, and I just have to paste the paragraphs into the code which isn't too much time. But I still wish it could do much larger outputs. It also seems to save everything from each article topic(all the articles I paste into it during a coversation, even when moving on to the next one), and will just not be able to continue after maxed out(chatgpt version can go much longer, seems it clears at least some stuff from catch, but API version hypothetically has a higher capacity per output).

It's working ok, the first article I did like this ranked #10 24 hours after publishing, which for my site is great so my overall rankings aren't good. Really, I could get some decent traffic by just doing a few hundred more articles like this(which is what I'm doing still).

I would like to do batch outputs, but would need to include the template and general instructions(with 2-3 full text of articles from other sites with the specific niche info I want it to discuss, database info usually isn't specific enough for the niche topics I'm doing) in the prompts, would be very long prompts, might as do them one by one. Main snag is that I have to start a new GPT thread after about 5 articles, which is a pain, have to give it the structure over again.

What I like is it usually picks good info organised in a cool way for the table section(which is set on dark theme with hover effect, looks fancy), good F.A.Q. questions, and good bullet points. Though I wish it could do much larger outputs, I feel like there may be something I'm missing.

Anyway, if people have their own templates(even HTML and CSS no shortcodes) please share. The only problem I've had with straight up CSS and HTML it's more for it to write and then it is too brief on the paragraph contents. Of course, can do some of it more manually, by doing parts, but I'd really like to be able to do longer format articles(with shortcode sections so it's not a wall of plain text) with one output. Also, the shortcodes seem easier for mobile responsive, you can configure that with CSS, but doesn't always work great and got to tweak it, that "columns" shortcode can make any side by side content mobile responsive and always works perfectly without having to have that extra CSS written by GPT. I could do a much bigger output with lots of image sections, but need to still provide image urls(btw, it will do the alt tags and stuff).

I really think GPT friendly templates based on shortcodes can become a good alternative to elementor page templates, since populating things with a visual editor is so tedious, but there's a long way to go.
 
These models really have a limit on output, like 4K, 8K, 16K or even 32K at once. However, since they have a huge context window for input, the auto-blogging scripts use this feature to generate the article piece by piece, sending the previously generated text to the GPT model and asking it to continue the article over and over again until it is completely written. We use cyberseo pro, but you may want to check out the new ai autoblogger plugin from the same company. We haven't tested it yet, but as its description says, it uses the same article generation algorithms and has a more user-friendly interface.
I started using the ai autoblogger you suggested

It is a lot better than I imagined, in fact I almost feel stupid now for doing some much before.

For one, I can add HTML to the beginning and end of the article, so all the extra formatting I was using for the font sizes and article width I can put in there, you could even use more advanced CSS styles with it if you wanted to. Also, at the end I could add anything, like a ranking block(like for casino blogs, which I have a lot of)

Also, I underestimate GPT's understanding of the niche without manually inputting info(seems it's already has it all mostly in it's database). Also, their article suggestions are way better than I expected. I use very narrow topic, to get it to find topics that are more specific and less general(e.g. lower vol lower comp keywords for my niche).

It's working great. Some shortcodes for some reason it didn't do right even though GPT usually does(I think it may combine formatting suggestions), but most do. Only real issue is I manually got to add the yoast title and description(not really a problem), and that if I set it to use the first section image as the thumbnail/featured image, the image will appear twice in a row at the top of the article(theme automatically includes featured image). Anyway, just takes 10 seconds to remove image code in the first section and it's fine. One other occasinal glitch is it'll do 2 F.A.Q. sections instead of one. No big deal, I quickly check when I go to add the yoast details and to remove the duplicate image, most of the time good.

I set it to save as draft so I can check and finalize and publish. I think I will add it to 10 sites, once a campaign is set, not too much maintenance,

It's way faster than doing it manually with GPT, and longer content, because the max cap is per section rather than the full article(by default, longer than I need, I turn it down a little).

In the beginning of the prompt, I add a list of 30 urls for other pages on my site (product categories and product pages), explain what each page is, and instruct it to use 2-5 contexual links per article(it usually ends up doing that many links per section, which is fine). But it does well of using natural related text as the anchor text. Could even provide it a list of 20-50 various affiliate links, and it'd add those in topically as well.

At first, it kinda was depressing, considering all the work I've done semi-manually on my sites(lots and lots of weeks and hours), and putting all that effort and care in my ego would like that to mean more, and this in some cases this is doing a better job(plus really, not only can you really configure the topic, how it breaks it down with table and bullet point sections, shortcodes for more advanced page features and styling, but configure all that, and it's basically 99% of the word done for it to go and do 50 articles, whereas manually that'd be like 2 articles of work, so no matter how good in my mind my two articles are, obviously I'd rather have 50 about as good articles). However, now, I'm just eager to deploy it on a larger scale. Really honing in on long tail keywords. Genuinely I'd love to dominate this niche, try to revive my casino sites some(though that niche is hard, not a whole that hasn't been done a zillion times). I'd really like to have like 50-100 sites going(with maybe 50 on weekly posts, 20 on multiple daily, another 30 on 1 a day), will take take to get there(still requires a bit to manage, especially if doing a variety of niches, across many affiliate programs, actively promoting about 40 different affiliate programs now, though in a few years, I'd like to get that number up to 250, even if I don't necessarily get paid regularly by most of them - or some ever - just want to chum the waters enough for a chance at enough).

I don't know why, but I imagined it only being able to cover generally topics vaguely.
 
Sorry to be off topic, but how is the casino niche going with Google? Is it penalizing your sites for gambling? I'm not in that nice, so my question may sound a little lame.
 
Sorry to be off topic, but how is the casino niche going with Google? Is it penalizing your sites for gambling? I'm not in that nice, so my question may sound a little lame.
Fucking awful

I have a lot of casino review site, and none of them did well with SEO from when I made them, till now(I made a lot of sites, 13, hoping more specific domains would help get some traffic for specific searches, even though the first sites I made weren't doing well, was hoping some got enough traffic that making enough of them it'd add up, really didn't. I have better SEO luck in the niche I'm doing now), most of them awful in fact and some of my sites never get clicks. I do get some clicks here and there on a few sites which brings in some players occasionally, but sparse. Oddly some actually get more impressions on bing some how. No official penalty I'm aware of.

That niche is just fucked in my opinion. Not because of google penalties(I mean all the sites you're gonna find when searching online casinos are sites about online casinos, so wouldn't they all be penalized? They're all filled with rip off deposit bonuses and lame info, from doing a bunch of casino reviews myself I've see the best ranking "reputable" sites just have completely wrong details about a site in their review but still get ranked at the top, so it's not like any reason the top ranking sites wouldn't be penalized too). Most of the sites that do well(mixed in the SERPs with parasite SEO) are just longer established and have 10s of thousands of backlinks. The problem is, there's like 10s of thousands of casinos review sites out there, a lot of high budget ones too, with new ones popping up all the time. There's dozens of sites with reviews for any 1 casino, if not hundreds, so fat chance of ranking.

Too saturated, everyone is trying to compete for the same terms, only so many ways how to word things. Need like 25,000 backlinks even for a small site, and just having the backlinks isn't a guarantee. There's just so many pages about the same damn thing for anything you search in that niche, including low volume searches, so it's hardly worth trying. I am just thinking I might just give it a go with adding a lot of articles to those sites to see if it helps at all. The only good thing about the niche, is if it's traffic from people looking for casinos it converts well and if you snag 1 big depositor it can make you a lot from just a little traffic(if youre lucky). Which is why I will at least try with the autblogger to see if they can bring in at least a little traffic, though at the least having a bunch of blog posts and a nice design with lots of reviews - could maybe still fetch a decent price for sell the site idk(would still convert great for paid traffic or traffic from other sources). I spent a lot of time building those 13 sites so might as well see if enough blog content could revive them a little idk
 
Hello friends!

Maybe I missed something due to translation problems.

I am interested in a plugin with ChatGPT for WordPress so that you can insert [a shortcode], in some format, and he wrote the text according to {random query}, or according to the title of the article. Is there such a thing?
 
Hello friends!

Maybe I missed something due to translation problems.

I am interested in a plugin with ChatGPT for WordPress so that you can insert [a shortcode], in some format, and he wrote the text according to {random query}, or according to the title of the article. Is there such a thing?

The CyberSEO Pro plugin for WordPress. It implements all the features described above.
 
Back
Top