Google will disappear in five years! Rejoice!

I agree ..google has a long term planning to be in the market ...no one knows what google come up with ...they are good enough to buy anything related to mobile stuff ..they will not allow some one else to take giant leap ...before some one come up they will take over :)
cheers !
 
Google made all shitty changes hoping to get more moneys from big boss and they dont care tiny fishes ...20 % down is not real ...maybe 60 % down in profit is the right number ..it's a Award for G
 
Google is like Phoenix, they emerge from anywhere.
 
lol this is hilarious. While I definitely think that they will have some trouble with future growth (particularly because everyone already uses them, and because of mobile phones) I wouldn't say that they'll disappear.

And Siri... really? lol
 
stupid forex rumor articles, their stock only dropped 10% the other day due to some jackass reporting the wrong annual numbers
 
I love how people hate on google, matt cutts so much etc. Yay rejoice google is going down, blah blah blah if you were making $$$ you wouldn't be so pissed. the game is always changing so get used to it
 
Google isnt going away. sorry people. Google has beaten AOL, micorsoft, yahoo, and even apple
 
Doesn't google have "Google now" which is supposed to be better than siri?
 
I see how Google causes a lot of problems. I just do not think they will collapse in five years. I am not defending Google, far from it. I am just asking that this forum concentrate on fact rather that baseless rumor.

The OP clogs up the forum with articles that have little to do with actual, current blackhat SEO. I am asking that we concentrate on the business at hand, BHSEO.



Anyway my posting here wont change a thing. So I will just take a step back and let you guys get on with it. Enjoy wasting time on another pointless thread :)

If the thread is pointless why reply?
 
I love how people hate on google, matt cutts so much etc. Yay rejoice google is going down, blah blah blah if you were making $$$ you wouldn't be so pissed. the game is always changing so get used to it

yeah, i make my money through iTunes selling apps so i don't really have much skin in the game in google anymore...thank god!
 
If the thread is pointless why reply?

B/C my threads annoy the hell out of this guy....

I was thinking about this...I am on a number of forums that relate directly to my niche and I defend my company as passionately as @MaxTucker defends google and the only reason I defend my company as he does google is b/c I have a financial reason to do so...

Also, @MaxTucker seems to reference "Cadie and Eric" by their first names like he knows them personally...this guy seems to be an econ/pr rep...when has anyone here referenced authors by their first name, like he/she knows them...

i don't know, this guy seems super fishy...
 
Last edited:
Effort? Not really, my business is economics. I know who Cadie and Eric are, there was no effort. I remember her article on Facebook, it is the most read article of her career. I know Erick Jackson because he is bullish on Apple stock and I am bearish (successfully).

I'm sorry, but this guy knows "Cadie and Eric" so much so that he calls them by their first names and he says his investigations were no effort b/c he knows these individuals so intimately...google must have hired this guy as a public relations rep to get on this forum and talk good about them..

who among us here can recite such information about specific authors with no effort?

exactly...no one here...

can someone here get this guy banned?...
 
Im a dumb ass and even I know how bogus that report is.
Google has their eggs in much to many baskets to be going anywhere, I personally don't think they will dominate the web for ever either but that doesn't mean they are going anywhere.
 
Im a dumb ass and even I know how bogus that report is.
Google has their eggs in much to many baskets to be going anywhere, I personally don't think they will dominate the web for ever either but that doesn't mean they are going anywhere.

I agree with you, but you don't defend google with so much vigor...

And I never really said I agree with the original article...I was just trying to generate a conversation....
 
I agree with you, but you don't defend google with so much vigor...

And I never really said I agree with the original article...I was just trying to generate a conversation....

sorry, since there is no emotion is text its hard to see what someone is saying.
I was trying to reply sensibly
 
sorry, since there is no emotion is text its hard to see what someone is saying.
I was trying to reply sensibly

while text is not a good measure of emotion, the number of words an op will author is...the more words, the greater the passion...
 
Article says "could." Thread title says "will."

Disingenuous OP at best.
 
Back
Top