Google on Automatically generated content

xReminisce

xReminisce

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
7,333
Reaction score
36,785
Source: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/auto-gen-content
Automatically generated—or "auto-generated"—content is content that's been generated programmatically. In cases where it is intended to manipulate search rankings and not help users, Google may take actions on such content. These include, but are not limited to:
  • Text that makes no sense to the reader but which may contain search keywords.
  • Text translated by an automated tool without human review or curation before publishing
  • Text generated through automated processes, such as Markov chains
  • Text generated using automated synonymizing or obfuscation techniques
  • Text generated from scraping Atom/RSS feeds or search results
  • Stitching or combining content from different web pages without adding sufficient value
Click to expand...

So, Text translated by an automated tool without human review or curation before publishing

So they pretty much OK if you use AI and review it before publishing? :anyway: :suspicious:
 
Advertise on BHW
How mean google bots spend the entire day crawling our sites and our tired of human written content that’s not for them, so now they want content for them common respect that, also AI content is the next big thing
 
HustleTong said:
I doubt if they have any valid metric to resolve AI-generated content from handwritten content atm
Click to expand...
Yeah, I been playing with lots of AI content so far and honestly, some of these are better than some freelancers :x
 
The thing with Ai content is it still needs editing, fact checking etc etc before being posted, unless you're just using this on buffer sites.
 
MisterF said:
The thing with Ai content is it still needs editing, fact checking etc etc before being posted, unless you're just using this on buffer sites.
Click to expand...
For sure, but then again, how many "freelancer" writers that you ain't working on a regular basis with that you can just trust completely and have someone/or yourself proofread, fact check etc.

Thus saying that, AI has evolved quite a bit, from what we had prior to syntax spinning & snip and stitch into forming actual readable sentences

I did saw someone google had it's own AI content bot in development awhile back that rivals GPT-3, which I completely don't doubt at all.
 
How does google distinguish AI translated content from real translation if we use Google translate.
 
I do know Google pays a lot of businesses to make them Ai content so I am pretty sure they use it often.
 
Jimoz said:
Which is getting you best output?
Click to expand...
The main longform i use is not as wide known and I rather it stay that way :p
I also use a few others in combination with Javis, Copysmith & eleuther

The facts are prettyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy off when used for long form at times, but if you have a competition's article and fact researched already, things get moving alot faster.
 
xReminisce said:
The main longform i use is not as wide known and I rather it stay that way :p
I also use a few others in combination with Javis, Copysmith & eleuther

The facts are prettyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy off when used for long form at times, but if you have a competition's article and fact researched already, things get moving alot faster.
Click to expand...
Okay, from what I see rytr.me is generating decent content. You can check em out!
 
xReminisce said:
Source: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/auto-gen-content


So, Text translated by an automated tool without human review or curation before publishing

So they pretty much OK if you use AI and review it before publishing? :anyway: :suspicious:
Click to expand...
You should "publish" a one word article -
Then edit it with 20,000 AI spun words :anyway:
 
It's okay to translate the content and publish it after fixing grammar.

It's okay to copy content from others add some more text and get ranked curated content.

I have seen many curated articles getting ranked 2 years ago.

It's okay to use GPT-3 to create content.
 
ofc it's completely okay,
They have no option to detect if the content has been written by AI in the 1st place, especially if it has been manually reviewed and readable,
Also, logically, there's no problem if the content is readable and do provide value to the users, Google is trying to handle the spam not the AI-generated content
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top