Google+ hits 100 million monthly users

AndyPR

Registered Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
51
Reaction score
27
Google announced recently that the social network has just surpassed the 100 million monthly users mark. The new number is significant, not least because it shows that Google+ is far from being the ghost town many are suggesting it is. 100 million people is a lot of people and the time it took for Google+ to get there is relativity fast. How much does it got to do with the fact that Google gives it a big weight and importance in sites page ranks.
 
That might be the case, but I think people got into the G+ since most have gmail accounts and google just automatically get you into it, and also the hype that went around it when people were frustrated with facebook frequent changes. I don't see myself getting into G+ but since it's good for ranking my site, I have to be there.
 
so you are saying we have 100M users to monetize in there xD
Time to milk that
 
Many webmasters including me has dozen G+ accounts just for improving a site's SEO. If they are referring to all registered accounts, I'm not sure how many users are really active there at this moment.
 
Wow,and I thought google+ is used only by google employees :cool:
 
I beg to differ on that motion:

http://techland.time.com/2012/02/28/the-average-user-spent-only-three-minutes-on-google-last-month/

Google plus is good is using the rel="Author"/"Me" function on website profiles an the Contributor to function, helps with Whitehat Link building that is essentially extended PR. There, you can move on to link building tiers.

I will say, niches do seem to be healthy in G+ and isn't exploited enough. But 100M isn't remotely representative of the active users, many accounts are completely passive/innocuous.
 
Google plus is growing fast because it's recommended for all websites
 
I beg to differ on that motion:

http://techland.time.com/2012/02/28/the-average-user-spent-only-three-minutes-on-google-last-month/

Google plus is good is using the rel="Author"/"Me" function on website profiles an the Contributor to function, helps with Whitehat Link building that is essentially extended PR. There, you can move on to link building tiers.

I will say, niches do seem to be healthy in G+ and isn't exploited enough. But 100M isn't remotely representative of the active users, many accounts are completely passive/innocuous.

i would agree 100% ... hope they will show us the number of inactive or bot accounts... but you know that wont happen.
 
I actually like Google for personal use. Much prefer it to FB, actually. HOWEVER . . . as it stands, I really think it appeals more to users who are more tech-savvy than the average FB user. That being said, I can see Google making it a lot more user-friendly in the near future, while keeping the techie bells and whistles that appeal to geeks like me.
 
I was reading somewhere some time ago a toplist of sites traffic.

#1 Microsoft 1.1 billion monthly users
#2 Google 900+ million monthly users
#3 Facebook 800 million monthly users

No wonder G+ is growing fast. I am simply too busy with other work to try G+ out thus I don't feel too convenient about giving personal information to google.

Think about things for a moment, your phone calls are being recorded, when you use bonus cards at store, they record what you eat/buy, you use gmail, your phone calls are being recorded, your internet activity is being recorded by our ISP

Now with G+ you give them your friends and interests. Think about that. We're pretty much under a total control already. Who want to celebrate this considering the facts I gave?
 
My question is really how active the users are. There are tons of ppl with google accounts, but their + accounts are simply just ghost shells.
 
So is Google plus a success then? There are millions and millions of Google users. They use other Google products as well. 100 million is a big mark, but they will still need time to catch up with the big "F". I hope you know what I mean? :)
 
Half of those accounts are owned by IMers :P

Google announced recently that the social network has just surpassed the 100 million monthly users mark. The new number is significant, not least because it shows that Google+ is far from being the ghost town many are suggesting it is. 100 million people is a lot of people and the time it took for Google+ to get there is relativity fast. How much does it got to do with the fact that Google gives it a big weight and importance in sites page ranks.
 
My question is really how active the users are. There are tons of ppl with google accounts, but their + accounts are simply just ghost shells.

If you read the article I posted, they claim that Google+ users average 3 minutes a day (It's a few months back, so the figure is at 90m users).

I think it's a UX thing more than anything for duplicate accounts. I know I have personally accidentally created multiple G+ accounts when creating a new emaill (or adding a domain email to gmail etc) and was unaware of it until I googled myself. For a company that focuses so much on product design, especially considering how excellent Google Docs is, this seemed to be a major oversight with new email creation automatically making a new G+ account:
Sure, it increases the 'number' of users and looks pretty on a press release but it goes against Google's end game of creating a sustainable Social Network that isn't perceived as a ghost town or overrun with GIFs.
 
Back
Top