Google hate Biography niche?

Ai Samuel

BANNED
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Messages
343
Reaction score
127
I am a biography niche blogger and over some years now I have noticed that biography niche is always favorite for Google Algorithm Update to destroy no matter how I write them.

How do I build through biography niche that Google won't disturb me? I focused mainly on footballers biographies.

Any tips?
 
Most people focus on keywords, but the real win is making Google trust your bio pages — add unique narratives, emotional hooks, and structure them like mini-stories to keep users engaged (Google tracks that). If you want, I can share some of my proven strategies in PM.
 
The thing of biographies and overall encyclopedia articles-like is an issue with Authority. You might need to be authoritarian enough on your niche to basically suggest google that you are not writting b****t about the people biographied. And to get authority in encyclopedia niche you don't need a couple of links. You need a mountain. Personally I would say one of the worst niches to target with Wikipedia reigning there.

Also the word hate is to generic... Given that you are called "AI Samuel", then yes, "Google hates the useless AI biographies pages". But Google generally provides the best Wikipedia result for most biographies, which is exactly the link I'm expecting to read if I'm looking for this. Nowadays with so much AI on Google, I personally find it so useless that I directly ask Perplexity for answers, o I expect an official results on first position only when I actually submit a search. So I don't think that Google "hates" biographies themselves, but it hates you particularly and how you are f****ng them :)

Probably if you wrote a biography for a not very well-known footballer curating his story manually with an interview with the guy and all the quality content you can image regarding this, you will prob be #1 for that result even without a single link. But who is gonna waste so much time in a long-tai keyword in an AI era?
 
Last edited:
Most people focus on keywords, but the real win is making Google trust your bio pages — add unique narratives, emotional hooks, and structure them like mini-stories to keep users engaged (Google tracks that). If you want, I can share some of my proven strategies in PM.
Yes. I am more interested to see that. I'll really appreciate
 
May be it is easy to build and scrap. That is why. I have seen people are master at copying and make their website within a day.

Improve it with real content and live information. That might work.
I have done both on real content and add extra informations about each players but yet Google update still destroy it
 
Probably if you wrote a biography for a not very well-known footballer curating his story manually with an interview with the guy and all the quality content you can image regarding this, you will prob be #1 for that result even without a single link. But who is gonna waste so much time in a long-tai keyword in an AI era?
Even with this it still doesn't work. And what do you mean by that long tail keyword? Because I used long tail keywords on my Biography niche
 
I have done both on real content and add extra informations about each players but yet Google update still destroy it
If this is the case and you know it then you should leave this niche. Find a new one. Since we don't have control over Google update.
 
If this is the case and you know it then you should leave this niche. Find a new one. Since we don't have control over Google update.
I love the niche because it brings in traffics the moment your posts are indexed
 
Probably because the author writing the content is more important than the content itself or the domain it is published on.

And if author does not have enough credibility, the content gets punished.

-
 
Probably because the author writing the content is more important than the content itself or the domain it is published on.

And if author does not have enough credibility, the content gets punished.

-
Credibility is the problem here. New sites don't just get credibility just like that and Google doesn't want to wait
 
Great insight! Try adding unique value. Like exclusive stats, verified sources, or timeline visuals. Focus on E-E-A-T: real author bios, credible references, and original commentary. That helps with Google trust.
 
Credibility is the problem here. New sites don't just get credibility just like that and Google doesn't want to wait
Create this credible author.
Focus on him, not the websites.

Publish one primary website, a central hub of the author.
Publish multiple secondary websites by the same author. Ideally the exact same name but different TLD.
Get references for him rather than the websites all over the internet. Backlinks, mentions, interviews, podcasts, books, citations etc.
Interlink the websites.

-
 
Great insight! Try adding unique value. Like exclusive stats, verified sources, or timeline visuals. Focus on E-E-A-T: real author bios, credible references, and original commentary. That helps with Google trust.
How do I go about adding all these? Like the timeline visual because for exclusive stats Google might still say it's copy and paste
 
Create this credible author.
Focus on him, not the websites.

Publish one primary website, a central hub of the author.
Publish multiple secondary websites by the same author. Ideally the exact same name but different TLD.
Get references for him rather than the websites all over the internet. Backlinks, mentions, interviews, podcasts, books, citations etc.
Interlink the websites.

-
I'm not sure I understand you.
 
Google doesn’t hate biography niche—it just demands more trust. Try this: focus on factual accuracy, add author info, link to official sources, and show real-world expertise (like citing interviews or legit sports news). Treat each bio like a mini news article, not a wiki copy. That builds E-E-A-T and helps survive updates.
 
Back
Top