Google Fast İndexing

You can’t force Google to index 900k URLs split the sitemap, improve internal links and page quality, and ignore “instant indexing” tools since Google only indexes what it trusts, over time.
 
Let Google approve naturally, Dont rely on any other third-party tool.
 
You can’t force Google to index 900k URLs—fix crawlability, split sitemaps, strengthen internal links, and ignore “fast indexing” tools that promise shortcuts.
 
Thanks, all! For 900k URLs, focus on splitting sitemaps, high-quality crawlable content, strong internal linking, URL Inspection for important pages, and relevant backlinks.
 
Submitting the sitemap again won't speed things up much if quality is low.
 
There’s no safe tool that can force Google to index 900K URLs fast. Most “indexing tools” (like better-search-console) aren’t official and often don’t work. Focus on Search Console, strong internal linking, crawlability, and quality pages Google indexes based on value and crawl budget, not tools.
 
You cannot reliably speed up indexing with tools, the best approach is splitting sitemaps, improving crawl budget and internal links,and avoiding paid indexing service which are usually unsafe.
 
Is there any method to speed up the indexing of my sitemap? I have over 900,000 links in my sitemap file, but after waiting for a month, Google has only indexed about 8,000 of them.

I found a tool called 'better-search-console.com', but I am not sure if it is valid or safe to use. Are there any reliable tools or methods for this?

Here are 2 things you can do

1- Make multiple sitemap files. - One sitemap should include maximum 50,000 urls and 50MB file size (Google's rule)

I would suggest put only 10,000 or 5000 urls only per sitemap.
Reason: If Google finds some thin pages in one sitemap file, it will ignore the rest of urls in that sitemap.

If Google finds 10% urls in one sitemap file is not worth indexing, It will not spend it's energy crawling and indexing the rest 90%.

So put 5,000 to 10,000 urls only per sitemap file.

And then create a sitemap index file to put all your child sitemap files together and submit only the index file to GSC.

2- Must use <loc> and <lastmod> tags in the sitemap. The <loc> is the url location, and The <lastmod> tag tells the last modified time of that page. When Google sees this with a fresh date, it will go and crawl that page.

Note: If Google will prirotize crawl and index the pages of your website, depends on the reputation of the site. If you feed quality pages to google you will build reputation for higher and faster crawl rate from Google. So make sure the pages you have added are atleast have some unique content.
 
It seems you are trying huge urls. Try using a internal Links plugins like linkwhisper. Avoid unpopular plugins or tools. This might harm you.
 
Is there any method to speed up the indexing of my sitemap? I have over 900,000 links in my sitemap file, but after waiting for a month, Google has only indexed about 8,000 of them.

I found a tool called 'better-search-console.com', but I am not sure if it is valid or safe to use. Are there any reliable tools or methods for this?
Please submit your sitemap manually in Google Search Console so Google can index your website faster.
 
Is there any method to speed up the indexing of my sitemap? I have over 900,000 links in my sitemap file, but after waiting for a month, Google has only indexed about 8,000 of them.

I found a tool called 'better-search-console.com', but I am not sure if it is valid or safe to use. Are there any reliable tools or methods for this?
To achieve better efficiency in indexing, the sitemap is to be pruned down to contain only indexable URLs, eliminate 404 errors and other non-value pages and large sitemaps are to be divided into smaller files that Google can index more effectively. The updated date must be real content updates and new pages must be linked internally to the strong pages and the low-value URL blocked and noindexed to minimize crawl wastes. Lastly, sitemap is to be submitted through Google search console and crawl statistics and indexing report should be observed to gauge the progress and determine the problems.
 
To achieve better efficiency in indexing, the sitemap is to be pruned down to contain only indexable URLs, eliminate 404 errors and other non-value pages and large sitemaps are to be divided into smaller files that Google can index more effectively. The updated date must be real content updates and new pages must be linked internally to the strong pages and the low-value URL blocked and noindexed to minimize crawl wastes. Lastly, sitemap is to be submitted through Google search console and crawl statistics and indexing report should be observed to gauge the progress and determine the problems.
 
You can’t force Google to index pages. If only 8,000 of 900,000 URLs are indexed, Google likely sees the rest as low priority or low value. Third-party tools like better-search-console.com are not official and won’t reliably help. The only real solution is better site quality, strong internal linking, clean sitemaps, and fixing technical SEO issues.
 
To achieve better efficiency in indexing, the sitemap is to be pruned down to contain only indexable URLs, eliminate 404 errors and other non-value pages and large sitemaps are to be divided into smaller files that Google can index more effectively. The updated date must be real content updates and new pages must be linked internally to the strong pages and the low-value URL blocked and noindexed to minimize crawl wastes. Lastly, sitemap is to be submitted through Google search console and crawl statistics and indexing report should be observed to gauge the progress and determine the problems.
 
there's no magic tool that forces instant indexing for hundreds of thousands of URLs, google indexes pages at its own pace, and trying to “speed it up” with third-party tools rarely moves the needle in a meaningful or safe way
 
Your setup appears to be producing a large volume of urls. using a reputable internal linking plugin like link whisper can help streamline this. avoid low adoption tools, as they can introduce unnecessary risk.
 
Back
Top