[GET] Stats Blaster 7.0 (35.000 Backlinks)

I saw from other thread using this script will get your site blacklisted as spam site from google. is that true?

AFTER JUST TESTING, I THINK IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THIS TOOL IS BAD...
But need to be confirmed !

I have a site which is in 2nd position on Google with one keyword. I submitted the site with Stats Blaster 7.0, and today it is the third page...
So, instead use with your own list.
 
Last edited:
You know what, I thought the same thing.
I will try this with one of my Youtube videos, and see what happens. Just to be sure: Do you want to see if it changes the amount of views, or how much higher the video shows for a keyword on Youtube?

Backlinking doesn't do anything for Youtube videos. If you want your videos to rank higher, get them more views and an exact title/tags match.

I saw from other thread using this script will get your site blacklisted as spam site from google. is that true?

Depends on the age of your domain. If it's brand new and you put up 35,000 in one day, you might dip for a little bit.

There's literally hundreds of these scripts out there, all that do virtually the same thing. I haven't tested this, but these are typically good in helping your new sites get ranked in Google. It won't take you instantly to page 1, but it'll definitely help in getting indexed if you keep it small and relatively evenly spaced.
 
Thanks a lot 4 sharing!

Testing this tool at the moment, tried 100 but didn't worked very well.

Checked with "1 Maximum Connection" and it does work, slow, but it work.

Maybe the maximum connections create a loop in the program or te response comes so slow.

I got 15 sites per 5 minutes, so, quite slow - anyway, better than nothing :)
 
If you can't get it to work make sure you put the url code at the end of your site, i noticed I couldn't add a site until i did that at the end. ..I could be wrong but I had another one like this and it doesn't really add that many backlinks, it scans your website through different stats sites but doesn't mean you get a backlink. I scanned mine through a similar one that said 100k backlinks and didn't notice many backlinks at all heh. I'm sure it helps but I really don't think you will get more than 100 and if you do it probably takes awhile for google to find them.
 
Windows VISTA OS
was using version 6 which worked fine.
tried newer release of version 7,
program loaded but it did not do anything.
tried the compatibility and take ownership bypass
still no activity.

any suggestions?
 
the urls is too old. many urls are dead.

Yes, and sincerely this is very good tool if used with a custom list, with good links and high PageRank for accurate results...
 
I used this tool too with a completely new site that I made that day.
I had the tool already on my pc for a long time, so maybe the URL's are close to obsolete. I will download this one and see if they are better..
Anyway, as I ran the program, it was extremely slow! After more than one hour of running, it still stood at 2%. So, I stopped it.
The day after, I checked, and my site was indexed! So, yes, I would recommend this tool for getting your sites indexed..
Is there a way to get a list of fresh URL's to blast to?
 
anyway, is this tool works well ??
i'va used many backlink tool, but the backlink haven't indexed until now..
 
This works on Windows 7 x64. At first it was detected by my antivirus (Kaspersky). I set a rule for it. You could try 'Run as Admin.' mode if you can't get it to run. With one thread it works at a snail's pace, but it doesn't matter that much on a 24\7 server. I tried with 50 and 100 connections, but they failed.
 
Thanks for the post... but how many freaking times can this exact program be uploaded with just a different name? Sheesh....
 
i remember blasting all 35k to a brand new domain when i was a newbie lol and only effect was faster indexing :p
 
Stat Blaster does not seem to be working for me, when I run it, it instantly says complete with the 33k list, as if its not doing anything. Am I doing something wrong...when you replace the {website} with the url do you or do you not include the "hxxp://" :confused:

Thanks for the help and for sharing this to the OP.
 
Back
Top