[GET] Google has released an SEO Best Practices Starter Guide (PDF)

ajushi

Registered Member

May 27, 2010

72

19

• Sep 29, 2010

• #1

This is the offical pdf. Haven't read it all though. You guys might already know the stuff in it but still it's a good read for us newbies

Get it here:

Code:

http://anonym.to/?http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf

HTH

 

Last edited: Sep 29, 2010

cbnoob

Senior Member

Sep 27, 2010

969

464

• Sep 29, 2010

• #2

Thanks, I hope google didn't hide anything in this report.

 

R

ruworth

BANNED

May 17, 2010

251

71

• Sep 29, 2010

• #3

Thanx

Only 32 pages

 

I

InternetIncome

Registered Member

May 10, 2010

51

1

• Sep 29, 2010

• #4

Thanks for this..

 

D

danny_boy

Regular Member

Apr 3, 2009

230

36

• Sep 29, 2010

• #5

thanks for that.. but its nothin new... the same old seo tips..

 

S

SalonSpaSource

Registered Member

Dec 31, 2009

65

7

• Sep 29, 2010

• #6

Thanks for sharing

 

anwarsheriff

Newbie

May 8, 2010

31

14

• Sep 29, 2010

• #7

Thanks for the share, It might be of great help for a newbie like me

 

R

r.moore

Newbie

Sep 29, 2010

1

0

• Sep 29, 2010

• #8

Like like! Thanks for sharing.

 

Z

zverr

Regular Member

Nov 11, 2009

411

125

• Sep 29, 2010

• #9

Yeah if you follow these guidelines you will rank your website in 10 to 20 years .

 

cbnoob

Senior Member

Sep 27, 2010

969

464

• Sep 29, 2010

• #10

zverr said:

Yeah if you follow these guidelines you will rank your website in 10 to 20 years .

Click to expand...

shorten that time by dipping you hat into ink

 

Baraba

Power Member

Jun 25, 2010

576

228

• Sep 29, 2010

• #11

Hmmm. I have Deja Vu that I read this document some years ago, but they say 2010 in the document. Probably it is updated from the old version. Before there was no images of the cute Google craw robot.

 

T

thermapower

Junior Member

Dec 26, 2009

183

32

• Sep 29, 2010

• #12

Thanks for sharing

 

Spaceman

Regular Member

Aug 8, 2009

435

53

• Sep 30, 2010

• #13

I wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.
Fvck whatever google says - do as you please and fvck them.

Who the fvck are they to tell us whats what?

 

ipopbb

Power Member

Feb 24, 2008

626

855

• Sep 30, 2010

• #14

Spaceman said:

I wouldnt touch it with a barge pole.
Fvck whatever google says - do as you please and fvck them.

Who the fvck are they to tell us whats what?

Click to expand...

Ditto!

But it's the best guide I've seen come out of google. It still smacks of an oppressive amount of "lies of omission". But, kudos on their best SEO communication effort made to date. It tops the "nothing" I expected from them.

 

G

grenty

Newbie

Sep 25, 2010

15

5

• Oct 1, 2010

• #15

Thanks, looks to be very informative.

 

wookie85

Regular Member

Apr 14, 2009

329

965

• Oct 1, 2010

• #16

Stop freaking cloging the thread with "thanks for sharing" crap posts, if you re so thankful pres the f$%$ing thanks button...!!!

 

B

bugaga

Junior Member

Jun 11, 2009

108

30

• Oct 1, 2010

• #17

learn to read between the lines

 

L

Luretryne

Registered Member

Apr 21, 2010

72

5

• Oct 1, 2010

• #18

This is great because we all needa know how Google wants us to SEO. That makes our SEO better since they deside the rules and we needa follow them.

 

ADHD-Dude

Power Member

Apr 17, 2010

592

119

• Oct 1, 2010

• #19

This is for noobs that ask if 4 or 5 links a day is to much, worthless book a waste of time and an insult to our intelligences, it is ment to keep us in the dark

 

L

Longover

Power Member

Jun 9, 2008

659

347

• Oct 2, 2010

• #20

The information on site structure and url info is a bit watered down. They show you a decent example that most people already know.

I really hate how Google treats self-promotion. In the guide they just have the stupid approach that "if your content is good then people will link to you."

Sorry Google, I don't like waiting 1 year to see my site rank on page 2 for my intended term. I'll keep backlinking and you can keep releasing your misleading guides that don't help any experienced webmaster.