Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu Linux, http://www.internetnews.com/blog/skerner/stallmans-attack-on-ubuntu-linux-is-bad-news-for-canonical.html via the "father" of Free Software, Richard Stallman, who http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/ubuntu-spyware-what-to-do, including Amazon search (with affiliate links) in their Unity Dash desktop search tool. But, does Stallman have a dog in the hunt? http://stallman.org/amazon.html with a laundry list of grievances that range from the legitimate to the ludicrous. And why is he so late to the game? Back in September Mark Shuttleworth http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1182, but later Canonical http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/ubuntu-add-legal-disclaimer-to-unity-dash. That was October. What awakened the sleeping giant? How can Stallman pejoratively claim Canonical is "spying," when Canonical made it very clear they don't track personally identifiable information and disclose what searches are relayed to their product search service, and how to opt out of it? Is his real objective to censure Canonical for violating free software users' privacy, or to stick it to Amazon in any way he can, harming an Amazon affiliate in the process? The question applies for all affiliate marketers: the internet runs on Linux, Apache, MySQL, GCC, and countless other free software packages. Does that give free software advocates and writers the authority to decide the right and wrong way to monetize your services, traffic, and userbase?