FOUND IT AGAIN! G00gle Crawling Backlinks Fast & Easy!

nECA_BG said:

What's the point of that thread??? I'm not gonna pay you anything btw just because of your arrogant attitude..

Click to expand...

Good The point of the thread is to get answers. period. Nothing personal

rabbitgirl said:

Have you tried pinging your backlinks (esp the profile backlinks)? And did it get g00gle to crawl it? If Yes, good for you! As far as i'm concerned, pinging isn't so effective in crawling backlinks (based on my experience). And it takes hours and days to keep pinging and pinging...what I do takes less than 60mins!

Click to expand...

your attitude is killing your sales pitch

Honestly, I wouldn't pay for it. More than likely, you got a blog network setup where you will add the links to get crawled (Google will crawl it in minutes and have it indexed within a few hours) and then you will remove the link from wherever you inserted it.

gorang said:

First of all, you didn't create the idea of using RSS feeds to submit backlinks. Peter Drew is the creator of HTML2RSS and LINKS2RSS and i've been using his software for YEARS which does this on autopilot.

You claim that "feedlisting/links2rss technique" is dead because everyone shared it?

Well it still works perfectly fine for me. In fact Peter just updated his software (now EVOPRO) and it works like a charm. So you didn't create the tehcnique and it is not dead, let's just get that out there so everybody knows.

Secondly, just a small problem with your claim. How do you know that 50k backlinks are crawled within 3-48 hours? I mean, I predict that a link will be crawled by Google when I use pinging, based on the way that Google crawls my sites when I use pinging, what do you base your claim on?

Last question, how can your technique be better than buying a large AutoApprove list for Scrapebox and dumping links on real blogs and then mashing your profile links into RSS feeds and submitting them.

If you really have come up with something amazing then i'll even spend my money with you, but I call bullshit on this.

Click to expand...

This will be my last reply to any of your posts (cos it seems u read things backwards) ...First, I didn't claim I owned or created any technique (be it links2rss, html2rss etc), I said I once shared the method. By dead I mean't both feedlisting and links2rss have been deindexed in g00gle. This method takes me minutes and very easy. I'm not saying all these AA scrapebox blasting and blasting wouldn't work, I'm saying this works fast and very easy to implement. I rest my case on your posts.

unknown00 said:

your attitude is killing your sales pitch

Click to expand...

You're getting it all wrong... It's not a sales pitch, just a survey. I'm not eager to make it a service, just curious to know what it's worth if ever I did.

What a crap thread.

I smell pre-selling, don't think it's allowed.

What a sad thread. LOL.

hztaa said:

Linklicious is crappy.

Google for "backlinksindexer comparison" as I cannot post links.

Click to expand...

How is something that does EXACTLY what it says it does, "Crappy".

It says it will ping ALL of your links at %100 rate and then drip them out at a rate you choose...and it does just that.

indexing isn't the end all, be all. Getting indexed is great, but you can rank all day without being indexed. You can rank as long as google KNOWS about the links and thats what linklicious does...it pings your links until google crawls them so that you can increase your SERPS.

HKSEO Rotzee said:

How is something that does EXACTLY what it says it does, "Crappy".

It says it will ping ALL of your links at %100 rate and then drip them out at a rate you choose...and it does just that.

indexing isn't the end all, be all. Getting indexed is great, but you can rank all day without being indexed. You can rank as long as google KNOWS about the links and thats what linklicious does...it pings your links until google crawls them so that you can increase your SERPS.

Click to expand...

This is exactly what I keep telling people. Your links don't have to be "indexed" to be found and counted by Google.

rabbitgirl said:

You're getting it all wrong... It's not a sales pitch, just a survey. I'm not eager to make it a service, just curious to know what it's worth if ever I did.

Click to expand...

Sorry to say, the response so far values it at:


drumroll pleaseeeeee

Sweet F-A

good afternoon chuckles

Anyone tried All Day Sucker??

All Day Sucker fools the Blog directories (and even the Search Engine Spiders) into thinking that your static and dynamic sites are blogs!

There we go again. False thinking (and talking) that Google will ban websites for rapid backlinking.

I have no patience writing a long post here, but given that I test EVERY single thing I do on fresh domains and 1 thing per domain; I know that you obviously tested nothing if you think Google will "Punish" you for rapid backlinking.

hztaa said:

Exactly. This is service for idiots who have no clue about blackhat SEO. I myself know several methods that gets your page indexed within a few minutes. I hesitate to use them because you want to grow your links slowly.. Even if that slowly means a lot per day, but no way in hell I want Google to know my every backlink in the same minute.

Click to expand...

ohh man!

Am I missing something here? I just do a small SB blast on my backlinks and ping my blast backlinks (not the backlinks going straight to my main domain) and it's been working just dandy. I usually wait a week or two to do my blast too... They always get indexed...

And no they don't have to get indexed to count either.

/fail thread lol

Tell you what RabbitGirl..... Let me in on your technique and I'll come a give you the best orgasm of your life. That is if you ARE female.

hztaa said:

Linklicious is crappy.

Google for "backlinksindexer comparison" as I cannot post links.

Click to expand...

Backlinks Energizer & Backlinks Indexer are very different than Linkilicious and serve two totally different purposes.

Ideally, it would be great to send everything through BE/BI service but when you start doing profile links you would need 500 clusters to keep up with the load, and you would be logging into 500 different sites to try to splice into chunks of 60 links at a time. Would be an absolute nightmare.

BE/BI are ideal, as they get your link spidered & indexed, both have a very good success rate. The problem is each site you put up handles about 60 links a day, so to get even 1000 links indexed a day it means you are running 17 wordpress blogs, logging into each of them on a daily basis and posting 60 links a day to each of them. If you try to do 10k links a day, you can see where it would go.

For important links, articles, web 2.0, or anything other medium quality link, BE/BI is a good idea. For mass linking like xRumer and forum profiles, they will never stay in the index and BE/BI are overkill and way to difficult to scale. That is where Linkilicious fills the gap perfectly. Not doing anything to the links, you will not see anywhere the benefit than when you run them through Linkilicious.

A lot of people still believe if a link is not indexed, it will not benefit your site.