fcs networker
- Thread starter cozziola
- Start date
blogtaufiq
Regular Member
- Mar 22, 2011
- 237
- 32
i'm FCSnetworker user. i think it's better for you to not use it. now the close the forum. so for support they use helpdesk. the success rate is bad and the account creator also crashed. when i read many thread about rankerx, i think rankerx is still better than FCS. i think FCS user will choose rankerx now. but until now i never use rankerx. can you tell me why you said " I need to leave rankerx as its nothing but trouble." maybe you can share your experience. thanks
i think you can try FCS for trial version.
i think you can try FCS for trial version.
Last edited:
Shaunm
Elite Member
- Mar 27, 2014
- 3,435
- 2,998
Ranker X has gone to shit, FCS is dead, SENuke is a waste of time. I'm hoping for SEREngines 2 to be decent but not getting my hopes up. Currently I cant think of any fully automatic web 2 creators that are worth the cash.
blogtaufiq
Regular Member
- Mar 22, 2011
- 237
- 32
hi can you share yur experience about rankerx. is the success rate is bad for now? because you said it has gone to shit
blogtaufiq
Regular Member
- Mar 22, 2011
- 237
- 32
how you build your web 2.0 for tier 1. did you use tool?
Shaunm
Elite Member
- Mar 27, 2014
- 3,435
- 2,998
It used to be decent and full of promise at launch. In my oppinion it has now been fluffed out with no follow links and is missing some basic features that I requested multiple times but they were never added. Success rates started to drop too so I stopped using the tool and removed the dev from Skype.
Since I stoped using it I have only heard bad things and that it is getting worse and worse.
Ambitious12
Elite Member
- Jun 26, 2014
- 3,109
- 616
I dont think this link building tool can give you what expectation is yours.NOt like GSA.
Yeah, gotta agree with everyone else here - I've tried pretty much everything minus RankWyz (they won't even respond to sales inquiries, so you can imagine my faith in their support lol) and haven't found an acceptable solution. AutoFill Magic works great for what it does, but it's not a replacement for a bulk web 2 tool.
Long time FCS user. Cancelled in May. It has gone to crap since Dan sold it. The new owner didn't even realize the fail rate on WP accounts. For a while, it was a very good tool (about a year ago). Wouldn't waste my money on it now.
RankerX I tried the trial. It took me three days to figure out how to use the software. Talk about a poorly designed workflow. I didn't like it at all. I asked if he could add a few minor improvements in the near future, and he blew me off. I don't see any value there.
RankWyz I tried about 2 years ago. The account creator was horrible. Never worked. Would be interested to hear if it has improved.
I am in need for a good 2.0 platform.
RankerX I tried the trial. It took me three days to figure out how to use the software. Talk about a poorly designed workflow. I didn't like it at all. I asked if he could add a few minor improvements in the near future, and he blew me off. I don't see any value there.
RankWyz I tried about 2 years ago. The account creator was horrible. Never worked. Would be interested to hear if it has improved.
I am in need for a good 2.0 platform.
jonwilliams
Junior Member
- Jun 22, 2016
- 190
- 22
I think now making manually web 2.0 links is better as auto tools are failed. You can blast them using GSA SER.
RedWerewolf
Newbie
- Sep 27, 2015
- 25
- 2
look into TurboWeb 2.0 - there's a thread for it in the marketplace here. they're actively updating it and they take suggestions seriously. there's a 5 day trial too.
fratermaui
Junior Member
- Jul 27, 2013
- 107
- 42
Don't waste your time, I used FCS for years, and its just junk. Ranker X is better coupled wtih Article Builder, but customisation is the KEY.
If you hire a filipino to customize your 2.0's and also customize your ARticle Builder articles using all the tools, then yeah... it can help, a bit.
But, bear in mind this sh.. is on its way out. Google wants to see real likes, interaction, the lot. Just creating them wtih content makes them dead sites of no value.
I've ditched FCS and built an authority blog. I'm already getting over 1000 visitors a week, and I have done ZERO SEO.
If you hire a filipino to customize your 2.0's and also customize your ARticle Builder articles using all the tools, then yeah... it can help, a bit.
But, bear in mind this sh.. is on its way out. Google wants to see real likes, interaction, the lot. Just creating them wtih content makes them dead sites of no value.
I've ditched FCS and built an authority blog. I'm already getting over 1000 visitors a week, and I have done ZERO SEO.
codyjason
Regular Member
- Jun 3, 2015
- 243
- 80
I think that RankerX still the best option for Tier1/2 nowadays. The website will start to get rankings up to page 1/2 within the first two months. For example,
Take a look at this url: http://www.uniotravel.com/vietnam-vacations-and-customized-tours.html . Lots of competitive keywords (e.g. vietnam vacations..) got into page 1 in 1 to 2 months.
Link building is just link building. So I only opt for the software that can build lots of quality links and fast. The rest is strategy. Autofill Magic is ok but slow and cannot meet my workload. TurboWeb to be honest is just junk, it is very slow because it uses real browsers and full of bugs. I have tried lots of software ranging from Senuke (had a life time license from the start), FCS Network (two lifetime licenses), Turbo Web (lifetime license) ... to GSA SER, RankerX. RankerX and GSA SER are my secret weapons now (cause my main criterion is building quality links last and in bulk). Also don't underestimate GSA SER. It can still build lots of quality thinks if you can scrape for your own list.
Just my 2 cents.
Take a look at this url: http://www.uniotravel.com/vietnam-vacations-and-customized-tours.html . Lots of competitive keywords (e.g. vietnam vacations..) got into page 1 in 1 to 2 months.
Link building is just link building. So I only opt for the software that can build lots of quality links and fast. The rest is strategy. Autofill Magic is ok but slow and cannot meet my workload. TurboWeb to be honest is just junk, it is very slow because it uses real browsers and full of bugs. I have tried lots of software ranging from Senuke (had a life time license from the start), FCS Network (two lifetime licenses), Turbo Web (lifetime license) ... to GSA SER, RankerX. RankerX and GSA SER are my secret weapons now (cause my main criterion is building quality links last and in bulk). Also don't underestimate GSA SER. It can still build lots of quality thinks if you can scrape for your own list.
Just my 2 cents.
HI Folks, I just ran a FCS Networker creation run with the following:
1. Semi dedicated proxy from Blazing Proxies
2. Pre-created email using their built in service
3. 4 threads
4. Auto Generated account info with exception of custom username
5. All accounts selected
6. Single run
Here's the results:
As you can see it does a pretty good job. There was an update recently to FCS Networker 6-10 and I'm not sure if that made a significant difference to the success of the account created but I can say that it looks like I created slightly more than I usually do. The key to this product working successfully is the proxies. If you're not having success with BuyProxies.org then try a different one since I think those are heavily used by folks on this forum.
I captured this with the scrolling capture feature of snagit which seems to work on FCS Networker!
There's my 2 cents.
1. Semi dedicated proxy from Blazing Proxies
2. Pre-created email using their built in service
3. 4 threads
4. Auto Generated account info with exception of custom username
5. All accounts selected
6. Single run
Here's the results:
As you can see it does a pretty good job. There was an update recently to FCS Networker 6-10 and I'm not sure if that made a significant difference to the success of the account created but I can say that it looks like I created slightly more than I usually do. The key to this product working successfully is the proxies. If you're not having success with BuyProxies.org then try a different one since I think those are heavily used by folks on this forum.
I captured this with the scrolling capture feature of snagit which seems to work on FCS Networker!
There's my 2 cents.
Market Madness
Registered Member
- Oct 13, 2016
- 59
- 0
So according to terfen the fcs network account creation is still working OK...... Can anyone else confirm this? Is FCS worth it?
incognito19
Registered Member
- Jan 5, 2011
- 81
- 27
I just used FCS to create the accounts online, 10 account creation projects, about 34 websites each. Returns are pretty much the same on ALL 10 projects, Out of 34, 33 errors, 1 success. At the end ONLY 20 accounts were added to the PBN.
I used my own proxies (buyproxies) and 2captcha. I am going to test using their proxies, but I doubt the result will be any better.
I think RANKERX is much better than FCS, that is really on a nose dive, is just a matter of time for me to find a better way to create web2.0s, but I don't see any outstanding tools in the market right now.
Thanks everyone for their answers, and I hope my comment helps somehow.
I used my own proxies (buyproxies) and 2captcha. I am going to test using their proxies, but I doubt the result will be any better.
I think RANKERX is much better than FCS, that is really on a nose dive, is just a matter of time for me to find a better way to create web2.0s, but I don't see any outstanding tools in the market right now.
Thanks everyone for their answers, and I hope my comment helps somehow.
Market Madness
Registered Member
- Oct 13, 2016
- 59
- 0
So now in 2017... how are the Web 2.0s? So far havent had the greatest comments about.. Ranker X with Article Builde,r AutoFillMagic and TurboWeb... What do people think about these and other web 2.0 creators now in 2017?