kimvietphat
BANNED
- Oct 24, 2015
- 52
- 2
How to use a RankerX free trial?
Fcs networker, rankerx, turboweb etc
- Thread starter mistaree
- Start date
ZionTazia
Registered Member
- Oct 10, 2009
- 93
- 94
They will not leave FCS Networker for dead, they have a good business with many customers, I don't think they just leave that. And just today I contacted their support and got an answer after 12 hours.
I use Autofill Magic for T1 and FCS Networker for T2-T3 and GSA for T3 and below (sometimes T2 with strict filters), all 3 are great tools to have.
beingink
Senior Member
- Sep 19, 2013
- 1,051
- 240
I have used both turboweb and rankerx here are some pros and cons. If you decide to get let me know..
Rankerx
Pros-
1. Super easy to use.
2. Fast setup.
3. Has social bookmarks, profiles and web 2.0.
4. Is updated so low fail rates, almost none I experienced.
5. You can use it on any computer or tab. Its browser integrated ( something I hope more developers would do ) so you just have to have the install and can login and start using.
6. If you scrape thousands of custom footprints site you can add them easily, so you can add thousands of new web2.0 or bookmarks easily.
Cons-
1. Its closed end, you can't edit sites or change step or configure any scripts.
2. I didn't find support that good, they tried to be helpful but it was nothing compared to turboweb.
3. Somehow it had more of a deletion rate (maybe cause of the steps it ran )
4. Price is a bit too high for me. Not a big fan of monthly payments either.
5. Its a bulk link building tool, so if you are looking for something to help you create good stuff, this won't work.
6. You can add sites, but they have to be in custom footprint, so if you are trying to add a certain hq site, you won't be able to.
Turboweb
Pros-
1. You can add, edit or modify any site within the software or ones that you have.
2. Support is awesome.
3. I liked the interface much more focused and campaign oriented.
4. Since I can edit and add sites, I was able to create custom scripts for many more sites.
5. Extremely low deletion rate because you can add pauses so it doesn't look bulk created.
6. If you are looking to create quality web 2.0 and can spend some time, you should get this.
Cons:-
1. You can only use it on one computer, unless ofcourse you use a vps.
2. It has bugs, sometimes the software reacts weirdly but it is updated constantly so if you let them know they might fix it.
3. Has a learning curve, if you are not a coding geek or even a beginner like me you will need some help creating, editing scripts. You can contact them though and they help through skype.
4. A lot of times it fails to do what it should exactly be doing like missed emails in email verification.
5. Only has article, profile and web2.0.
All in all after using both the trials I decided to go for turboweb simply cause I can add edit sites easily and keep them to myself without letting anyone know. Plus its cheaper which is a huge plus for me cause I am no place to buy expensive stuff right now.
P.S I tried FCSnetworker too and it was a horrible experience, I could only download the account creator since I couldn't even login into the web system. They replied after 2 days after which I asked for refund. Also that account creator was so damn ugly, it just felt like that won't work. So when it did work, I got two successful creations. They need a makeover man.
P.P.S I tried all the three softwares in the past few weeks.
Rankerx
Pros-
1. Super easy to use.
2. Fast setup.
3. Has social bookmarks, profiles and web 2.0.
4. Is updated so low fail rates, almost none I experienced.
5. You can use it on any computer or tab. Its browser integrated ( something I hope more developers would do ) so you just have to have the install and can login and start using.
6. If you scrape thousands of custom footprints site you can add them easily, so you can add thousands of new web2.0 or bookmarks easily.
Cons-
1. Its closed end, you can't edit sites or change step or configure any scripts.
2. I didn't find support that good, they tried to be helpful but it was nothing compared to turboweb.
3. Somehow it had more of a deletion rate (maybe cause of the steps it ran )
4. Price is a bit too high for me. Not a big fan of monthly payments either.
5. Its a bulk link building tool, so if you are looking for something to help you create good stuff, this won't work.
6. You can add sites, but they have to be in custom footprint, so if you are trying to add a certain hq site, you won't be able to.
Turboweb
Pros-
1. You can add, edit or modify any site within the software or ones that you have.
2. Support is awesome.
3. I liked the interface much more focused and campaign oriented.
4. Since I can edit and add sites, I was able to create custom scripts for many more sites.
5. Extremely low deletion rate because you can add pauses so it doesn't look bulk created.
6. If you are looking to create quality web 2.0 and can spend some time, you should get this.
Cons:-
1. You can only use it on one computer, unless ofcourse you use a vps.
2. It has bugs, sometimes the software reacts weirdly but it is updated constantly so if you let them know they might fix it.
3. Has a learning curve, if you are not a coding geek or even a beginner like me you will need some help creating, editing scripts. You can contact them though and they help through skype.
4. A lot of times it fails to do what it should exactly be doing like missed emails in email verification.
5. Only has article, profile and web2.0.
All in all after using both the trials I decided to go for turboweb simply cause I can add edit sites easily and keep them to myself without letting anyone know. Plus its cheaper which is a huge plus for me cause I am no place to buy expensive stuff right now.
P.S I tried FCSnetworker too and it was a horrible experience, I could only download the account creator since I couldn't even login into the web system. They replied after 2 days after which I asked for refund. Also that account creator was so damn ugly, it just felt like that won't work. So when it did work, I got two successful creations. They need a makeover man.
P.P.S I tried all the three softwares in the past few weeks.
Last edited:
Google Prince
Regular Member
- Dec 24, 2015
- 209
- 182
Tried Fcs a couple months ago,
account creator is slow, & just aggravating to use.
Tried RankerX,
Hands down the best.
account creator is slow, & just aggravating to use.
Tried RankerX,
Hands down the best.
clean99
Junior Member
- Nov 15, 2012
- 180
- 337
FCS Networker is works fine for me with quality private proxies, death by captcha and high speed internet. Its a great link creator and network management tool. It just got an update on January 16 and the success rate is high once again. Haven't tried the other 2 tools so can't really comment on those
RedWerewolf
Newbie
- Sep 27, 2015
- 25
- 2
I use TurboWeb myself, and it works quite nicely for my needs. I make a whole bunch of accounts, and then I manually go in and change templates/themes/whatever to make it look pretty and more "manual". I think this is fine for tier 1. It's also good for making tier 2's to my tier 1's.
Some of the sites in the list almost always ban me on sight though, and I still need to figure out how the scripting thing works to add more sites myself. I should probably get more than 10 proxies at some point... lol
Some of the sites in the list almost always ban me on sight though, and I still need to figure out how the scripting thing works to add more sites myself. I should probably get more than 10 proxies at some point... lol
dearviola
Newbie
- Feb 2, 2016
- 43
- 7
Really being on the fence of Turboweb or RankerX...
It seems like Turboweb is more focused on the Web2.0 properties building and managing. One more question for it: Is it available to manage PBNs besides Web2.0s?
RankerX on the other hand almost can do "anything" included as accounts creation, article submitting, social bookmarking, social signal blasting...Lots of people here even use it to build backlinks for their Tier 1 sites. Does that mean I could save a lot on it from many other social network building softwares and other web2.0 building and managing softwares (just like turboweb)?
I have ScrapeBox and GSA SER in my arsenal. Does RankerX worth the price for their "highest successful rate of submission"?
It seems like Turboweb is more focused on the Web2.0 properties building and managing. One more question for it: Is it available to manage PBNs besides Web2.0s?
RankerX on the other hand almost can do "anything" included as accounts creation, article submitting, social bookmarking, social signal blasting...Lots of people here even use it to build backlinks for their Tier 1 sites. Does that mean I could save a lot on it from many other social network building softwares and other web2.0 building and managing softwares (just like turboweb)?
I have ScrapeBox and GSA SER in my arsenal. Does RankerX worth the price for their "highest successful rate of submission"?
ZionTazia
Registered Member
- Oct 10, 2009
- 93
- 94
FCS Networker seems to go up and down since Dan had to sell it (to his partner which I think sold it to syndwire) Almost no updates anymore, no info from them on new ownership or anything about what's happening.
I don't get why they buy a business and then just throw it away.
EDIT: I have heard that they have big plans for FCS, I hope they stick to them, well, we will see.
I don't get why they buy a business and then just throw it away.
EDIT: I have heard that they have big plans for FCS, I hope they stick to them, well, we will see.
Last edited:
SargentoVoight
Junior Member
- Mar 20, 2016
- 102
- 12
Hello friend now I recommend personally using RankerX is the best thing you'll findto work with 2.0...
thanhclix
Senior Member
- Oct 25, 2008
- 941
- 312
How is turboweb's success rate recently? How many webs 2.0 and profiles does it support?
I used it before but succes rate is low, like only 10 articles were posted. And the created web 2.0s dont appeal to me. I really want to buy its lifetime version but cannot make up my mind.
umerjutt00
Elite Member
- Oct 28, 2011
- 4,373
- 2,493
I have not used FCS or Turboweb but I have recently bought a copy of RankerX. Its really good at what it do and sucess rate is amazing.
yes i'm still using fcs and i'm fine with it. sure the account creator sometimes only gets you 20-30 accounts but do another submission for the failed ones than its fine. Or just run another account creator let it run in the background and then just merge those accounts to a linked network in the web ui.