First they said "Unfortunately, we are not able to accept content which refers, promotes, or links to information on replica products as they refer to a name brand item. This would also include a reference to 'fake', or 'faux' products.
I suggest editing the article to remove any such content and resubmitting it for review."
Then I said "your terms of service do not say this anywhere! there are thousands of articles which refer to the area of replica. I just checked. If you want me to provide examples i can but come on I think you just made up that rule! I can change the resource box but there is nothing illegal about talking about replica items.
>
> Please respond because i have already written 50 articles to submit and this "NEW and UNHEARD OF" TOS is seriously messing up with my work and marketing plans. "
And they replied "You can reasonably predict that every month the quality standards rise on what we're able to accept.
Rather than going back to reject previous articles we've accepted because they no longer meet a newly updated editorial standard, we apply the new standards to all new submissions and any articles that are edited post-original-acceptance."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.