Looked over the shoulder of a colleague as she used it (Hi Vixenchick
)
SENukeX is nulled and the version I saw was several updates behind the "live" system - failure rates were correspondingly much higher as well.
Real nuke gives almost 75% success (combined) after sign up and submission for WEB2.0. with no manual intervention. (for sign up I often go in and fix the odd issue such as a password not being accepted or a blog name being the wrong format or already taken or whatever and up with over 80% success AFTER both sign up and submission)
This nulled version was less than 40% success - worse - it was the high PR sites that were failing (guess they update their scripts more often than the low PR sites) she got a bunch of PR3 - PR5 sign ups with nearly all the PR6 - PR9 sites failing
Also - watch out for pirated - nulled version for other reasons.
To combat these VPS there could be all sorts of lovely (nasty) stuff the devs could do. Like propagate their own "hacked" version - with a few nasty surprises in.
Maybe make a change in some of the registry settings and default file names and file structure that the updater will handle for registered user...BUT hackers using the "uninstall..re-install" route will completey cock up their projects and files.
Or altering it and instead of making accounts it went around deleting accounts, changing link destinations.
It could easily be altered to get you links from real internet no-go areas..you know - the sort of sites that get the feds around your house taking your PC away in a plastic bag and you needing to move neighbourhood to stop dog shit being stuck thorugh your letterbox every day.
And the coding to do it would take me about 60 minutes - the developers of nuke could probably do it in 20.
Hell developers could even send out a "clean" version of the software with update enabled - then transmit the "self destruct" to your servers the first time you went on the net.
Do you think the genuine authors of this software aren't considering this?
They could get a third party to do it for them (so they had plausible deniability when the shite hit the fan) and wait for the fireworks.
I know nothing about what the developers are doing - i haven't got a clue. But if these were my tools that i'd developed - you can bet your ass I'd be doing this right now.
End of the day... If you can't make $147 per month pay for itself with a tool like this, then you don't belong in the IM business in the first place.
