1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Experiences with Manual Penalties for "Thin content"

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by schnucki, Apr 26, 2014.

  1. schnucki

    schnucki Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    10
    A german site of mine got hit with a manual penalty for "thin content" (according to GWT). The penalty effected the whole site.

    Some more details:
    - All sites are still indexed and bouncing around in the SERPS between positions 40-60.
    - Most of my content is LSI optimized and gives the visitor exactly what he is looking for. (Physical product review-type keywords).
    - The content consists of a Top 5 list of the best products. I have 2 Affiliate Links per product (image + CTA as text link)
    - The content ranked in Top 10-20 positions for medium competition kw's with no backlinks at all
    - My bounce rate (according to Yandex) is 12,6% ---> Blows my mind that I got "thin content" when 88% of my visitors don't bounce back to the SERP's.
    - Never installed Google Analytics or GWT before the penalty.

    Any advice on how to recover from a "thin content" penalty? Please share your experiences.
    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. seoguruistheg

    seoguruistheg Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you got a thin content penalty, then you need to expand on that. Add more content and make the site significantly different from the sites that you link out to for commissions.
     
  3. InsanelySane

    InsanelySane Power Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    111
    This worries me too, was the rest of your comp "thin" or was it all meaty. Im inclined to think G would not penalize you if everything else was also thin.
     
  4. Knasper

    Knasper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    32
    Glad I found this post, what you describe is more or less exactly the same what happened to us last Friday.

    Let's see if we can figure out how to solve this problem.

    Our site is a finance site which is built upon reviews with a couple of affiliate links, and then inner pages that
    were created to hit long tail combinations and then convert thanks to tables that were similar on all inner pages.

    We have both GWT and GA installed and unlike you our bounce rate was pretty high, around 75%.

    The first thing I did was to remove all inner pages that were created with the sole reason to hit long tails and
    then convert. Then I sent a reconsideration request to Google.

    I got a reply much quicker than expected, within two-three days in fact. The opinion was that we were still
    breaching Google's guidelines with regards to 'thin content' and that the penalty should remain.

    As two other pages on the same GWT account also got the thin content manual penalty, I tried to figure out
    what was similar with the pages and it hit me that the review pages could be the problem, which seems to
    might have been the case even for you.

    I therefore decided to remove all review pages except one, put back the long tail pages, without the tables,
    so that they only provide useful information. Then I filed a new reconsideration request that I still haven't
    received a reply to.

    Let's try to solve this problem together, maybe we can even split test and try different things. Feel free to
    send Skype details in a PM if you want to discuss more thoroughly.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. schnucki

    schnucki Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    10
    Thanks for the reply Knasper. I just sent the reconsideration request 10 minutes ago. It would be a waste of time to list all the things I changed on the site right now, because I don't know if the penalty gets removed.

    I'll definitely update this thread once I get an answer.

    Any updates on your site yet?
     
  6. rootz

    rootz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    61
    Some of my pages got hit too. All pages that were in that GWT Account and running the same Theme got hit, no matter of content quality I guess, because there were some pages with a lot reasonably good content. All of the pages were affiliatepages, so I guess they just penalized all pages because of the pattern. There are some tests that I am going to conduct:

    1. Remove all products from one of the pages.
    2. Change the Theme of another page.
    3. Add Content to a third one.
    4. Just file a reconsideration request for a "quality" page.

    That way I can figure out how they look at the pages and see which penalties will be lifted. I will keep you guys updated.
     
  7. mahnazkut

    mahnazkut Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    37
    Occupation:
    Adsense, bitcoin. Travel SEO
    Location:
    UK
    I have got a response fast for my one of the small sites, negative. I did add more content and posts but didn't work.
    Now I 'll file another request for the bigger site with replacing almost all pages with well writtten content and removing the poor ones. I hope they response that fast again with positive result. will let you know guys.
     
  8. rootz

    rootz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    61
    Starting with the easiest step, I have removed all products from a page. To do that, I just had to alter the template a little, so it took me about 5 minutes to do so. Filed a reconsideration request and yesterday the penalty was lifted. I guess that I could just display the products again and would do just fine, but I am going to wait a little longer and maybe just add two products again, no spammy stuff. What do you think, do they monitor pages which were just depenalized?
     
  9. ursulanewitt

    ursulanewitt Newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2014
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    2
    Its just a way for them to penalize affiliate marketers.
     
  10. Scritty

    Scritty Elite Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    4,496
    Occupation:
    Affiliate Marketer
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    I think "thin content" targeting and slightly better duplicate filters are Google's next push.
    As recently as 2011 the front page of the SE's for many product names (and sometimes brands) was full of 1 page Wordpress.com wondersites - EMD microsites.

    They've pretty much been wiped, but there are still a lot of duplicate content and other thin sites ranking.

    I'm not saying Google will get it right (it rarely does) but that's what it seems to be attempting right now.

    Scritty
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. Asif WILSON Khan

    Asif WILSON Khan Executive VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Messages:
    10,115
    Likes Received:
    28,557
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Fun Lovin' Criminal
    Location:
    London
    Home Page:
    [h=1]What could the webspam team have done better?[/h]

    http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-regrets-acting-faster-paid-links-content-farms-191146
    http://www.seroundtable.com/google-cutts-spam-regrets-18541.html
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
    Last edited by a moderator: May 18, 2016
  12. Scritty

    Scritty Elite Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,807
    Likes Received:
    4,496
    Occupation:
    Affiliate Marketer
    Location:
    UK
    Home Page:
    Great post.

    They could have not pretended they knew the providence of most links - when clearly they are a country mile from knowing that.
    Inventing "Spam For Cash" in the form of negative SEO is about the asinine thing any search engine has ever done.

    Scritty
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  13. mktanny

    mktanny Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    62
    Occupation:
    Blog editor and IM
    I have had a decent amount of experience with all sorts of g00gle's manual penalties , and the most consistent factor with all of my sites have been the following --

    --I managed to rank the sites fast
    --Does not matter if i use blackhat or whitehat
    --Never used adwords
    --All the sites were scrapers (from multiple sources), but they all present the data in a manner that is useful to visitors (even after my sites are de-indexed from g00gle , i get a lot -- 100k+ uniques everyday from bookmarks and direct hits)
    --All the sites are in different niches and serve a different set of audience

    Right now i am testing with adwords + same strategy as above
     
  14. mahnazkut

    mahnazkut Junior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    37
    Occupation:
    Adsense, bitcoin. Travel SEO
    Location:
    UK
    Yep I tried to recover from penalty with best I can with ALL content replaced with quality articles, spent hundreds but does not work. Better to start fresh.