Experience with ChatpGPT and Google
- Thread starter reesh
- Start date
- Dec 29, 2012
- 6,818
- 30,409
It works, if your generated content is good and useful, google wont penalize it.
- Apr 25, 2014
- 6,906
- 12,170
As far as I know, they can’t fully detect that content, yet.
As far as rankings, indexing, and search results go: none of my sites have a manual action penalty. I’ve submitted articles to GSC and had some of them indexed this morning actually.
The articles have AI art as well.
As far as rankings, indexing, and search results go: none of my sites have a manual action penalty. I’ve submitted articles to GSC and had some of them indexed this morning actually.
The articles have AI art as well.
Prodmoistwood
Regular Member
- Jan 28, 2023
- 246
- 32
There is a lot of info about it online already, and I mean A LOT. From what I know, it's not very good for SEO and overall Google crawling. It's still now 100% certain, you might be lucky and do rank with ChatGPT content. However, if you really want to rank well and incorporate ChatGPT, you can just alter the generated content and add human touch, it's not perfect but certainly better than just using it straight up.
- Dec 29, 2012
- 6,818
- 30,409
yup, I said that for so long now, Google simply does not have the resources nor do they really want to commit to doing something like this
despite all these sites claiming to have "AI" detection.
It's just utter background noise,they are just trying take adv of the AI hype and make some dough.
It will do google way more harm than good if they ever come with a "AI detector" ban wave & they know that very well
- May 18, 2014
- 2,227
- 2,979
Google doesn't care if your content is AI or partially plagiarized or even translated. However, it does care if your content is garbage (unless you are an absolute authority). For us small guys, content does a lot of the heavy lifting which is why people get a kick in the nuts for using AI crap since they do not understand the difference b/w good and bad content. As long as your content flows well, is free of fluff and answers the search query, you will be fine. Interlink sensibly and always ALWAYS put yourself in the shoes of the person typing in the search query before you go on writing content. Long articles don't mean good articles. Just becuase something is well written, doesn't mean it belongs in the article. Exercise common sense and answer the search query and everything will work out 100%.
Russian Ivan
Registered Member
- Jan 29, 2012
- 59
- 11
Most likely in different topics and geo, such content will be ranked differently
- Nov 11, 2018
- 9,397
- 8,287
Yes, check out this beautiful picture:
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/i...-chatgpt-content.1499308/page-2#post-16410408
https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/i...-chatgpt-content.1499308/page-2#post-16410408
AgencyCheap
Junior Member
- Mar 1, 2023
- 139
- 63
Well done, bro!
Charlie©Smith
Regular Member
- May 10, 2023
- 241
- 114
Google won't penalize when your contents are effective and superior. Chat GPT creates full unique content according to the given keywords. But It's not good for seo and you won't get the proper consequences and your site won't rank on the whole.
Obsidian Knight
Junior Member
- Apr 17, 2022
- 139
- 50
I guess that the key, isn't it? To just create the best quality content for readers, regardless of how you create it. If it's valuable, engaging and interesting to the readers, you'll be fine.
newxomiachock
Registered Member
- May 10, 2023
- 68
- 38
I used chatGPT to help me with writing the essay in my University, it really made it more easy, but I had to check it for some logical mistakes
- Mar 23, 2022
- 3,704
- 999
Some have reported here that websites are not getting indexed on using AI content while others have opposite experience. So, it is hard to make a judgement, you have to try yourself.
Uncle Muriko
Senior Member
- Apr 8, 2012
- 826
- 236
Interesting point of view. Mind elaborating on why you think so?
- Dec 29, 2012
- 6,818
- 30,409
Google make money on Ads.
That is their #1, primary and main source of income.
They need to moderate enough to stay "reputable" and stay out of legal trouble.
Everything else honestly, is free game to them.
People may think Google hates their websites, seo etc etc but honestly, Google most likely really doesn't even know of your existence & have no real reason to target you either.
By making us all chase these constant SEO "algos" updates makes us feel like the game is still fresh and active & for people to contiune exploring the "wonders of SEO". /gags
To them, it's probably the aftermath results of them tweaking and polishing up their ads to optimize more revenue.
That's the first point to why even if Google has a failsafe AI detector, they won't use it at 100% to ban or blacklist websites.
The second point is
I can write an article that sounds and feel like an AI
An AI could be instructed to write and article as closely to human as possible.
With those 2 statements, there are infinite possibilities.
For example
I can feed and train my model with constant high school students showing it between students who write articles that are A, B and even C. then instruct an AI to write an article based on it's grades.
Would AI be able to tell, between an article that is written by a student who is just struggling with the English Language, or written by an AI attempting to mimic that?
Which then ties back to #1
Would Google really risk blacklisting websites that are potential revenue just because an article was written by AI?
I highly doubt it.
That's most likely why Google is going the approach of "Helpful Content" vs "Generated content for the purpose of ranking".
- Jun 26, 2023
- 479
- 350
Earlier this year during an experiment blogging with chatgpt, they manually dinged me when they reviewed my site for AdSense. Justifiably. I was using raw output with bad prompts, it was garbage even for GPT. They specifically mentioned AI generated content.
... That said, I was left with the impression (as people are saying here) that they didn't really care that it was AI, they only cared that it was shitty content.
... That said, I was left with the impression (as people are saying here) that they didn't really care that it was AI, they only cared that it was shitty content.
- Dec 27, 2019
- 3,107
- 813
I don't know what's causing the panic. If you're capable of generating high-quality content using AI, there's no need to worry.