webasiangirls
Newbie
- Mar 25, 2013
- 7
- 3
From my experience, postloop's approval system consists of either:
1. Choosing a number from 1 to 10, and matching it with a random number from random_org to determine whether you get in or get rejected for "poor grammar".
2. Using a half-finished grammar checker Bill Gates wrote in QBasic, one sunny day in the early 90s while taking a dump in his office
3. A consortium of most prolific writers and English language researchers that will deconstruct your writings and analyze states, properties and interactions of every single part of your post, from most elementary linguistic atoms to the higher and more abstract concepts that no one (including themselves) understands.
But looking at the average postloop grammar, we can safely rule out option #3. So it's either bad RNG luck, or Bill has done half-assed job again (no pun intended, etc).
So if your writing skills are anywhere above the [R]etard level (characterized by using 'ur', 'r' and similar constructs instead of words), I think you'll get better results with article writing. Heck, even if your grammar is on the level of drunken celebrity tweets or 15 year old myspace emo kids writing their last goodbyes with glittering letters, you'll get at least $0.50/100 words, compared to $0.05 you'd get from postloop (supposing you get accepted by the "I made this while pooping.exe" grammar checker).
And sorry for negativity, not sh'tting on your topic, OP. It's just lame when you put a solid hour into writing some quality posts, and then get rejected with a reason only an idiot who didn't even read the posts would write.
i completely agree with you..
respect to OP..
and I also know this is from 2012 post.. haha
but I am constantly searching for ideas I could try online