Don't waste time using ChatGPT 100% content

It does. It has support for 4096 tokens. But this isnt something you can do manually. My program uses around 20 separate models to create just 1 article
Click to expand...
hey..
1) are you using davinci model]?
2) what language do you use to code your program. looking to see the most trouble free programming language to use with davinci api.
thanks.
 
Advertise on BHW
Gebb said:
Another thing I noticed with AI checker tools is that sometimes the result depends on how long the text pasted is, the Huggingface GPT2 detector tool actually states clearly that it needs a certain number of tokens (so a certain lenght of the text) to be more reliable, but other tools don't.

Some ChatGPT detector tool also heavily fluctuates in the results, sometimes they give a 70% human content ratio for content that I literally copy-pasted in there from ChatGPT itself (and I didn't use any prompt to make it more human-like such as rewriting the text, spinning or any prompt specifically made for tricking tools, I just told "tell me X", it gave me the output and I just copy pasted that same output into Ai content detector tools).
Also tried searching for articles made way before the Ai copywriting tools, restricting search to articles from 2018, and copy pasted something in there and they detected AI content lol.
Those "AI detection tools" are easy to trick but can also (and that's even worse) generate a lot of false positives imo, you can trick the tool by adding some white spaces inside or just add some weird punctuation and then you go from 40% human content to 90% but then flag as AI content some random text that was human written (I mean, maybe poorly written but still human written).
Click to expand...
The human hand always makes the difference. AI is only used to get help. Not if you do all of your content with that. Am I right?
 
TheSplinter said:
These checkers don't recognize only ChatGPT's speech as AI generated. Anything that sounds like something regular fluent people wouldn't write can get flagged as AI. Bad grammar can get flagged as IA. Just bad speech in general can be flagged as AI. I've even tested my own posts and some got flagged as AI, since i'm not a native english speaker. Sometimes i tend to repeat the same word more times than ideal, which isn't considered a good practise. ChatGPT doesn that too. Also, a lot of "fillers" within the text. Which means rephrasing something you have already said to make the text look more dense. ChatGPT says a lot without saying much.

Anyone using this to create content is fooling themselves and that mistake will come back to bite them in the ass. Long story short, you should quit being lazy and focus on quality.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't worry about Ai checkers for SEO content, it's an impossible battle for Google to win. Why would they care anyways as long as the content is high quality? The good Ai checkers most likely use some type of classification model which means it costs just as much to check as it does to generate. Useful maybe for Academia, but definitely not SEO.

More importantly, no matter how unique your model is, all it takes is a set amount of training data from your model to then train the Ai checker. So even if you spend millions of dollars training your own model from scratch it wouldn't be difficult to "update" these Ai checkers for your specific tone. AI tools must have some underlying pattern that's relatively easy for other AI models to identify.

I've been working on a mass Ai article generator for the past year and it's almost beta ready. Despite utilizing a complex architecture comprising of around 25 different models that programmatically interject themselves, as well as various techniques such as embedding mappings, I'd still be wary concentrating on "defeating" some random Ai duplication checking model (which as explained above is a losing battle).
 
The sad part is no one actually knows what could happen to your site if you use AI content

People just assume google will one day take them down over it

And that’s how you have these ai detector products popping up now, taking advantage of the hysteria to try and make money
 
I have been using the chatGPT texts with the sequential rewrite, or reverse translation to a language and then back. So far, I am still experimenting with the rewriting tools, and haven't found the one I really like. So far, I am using Frase.io and tried a few others. The problem with these rewrites - it just takes time. I'd appreciate any suggestions for rewriting tools that can rewrite a whole article, not just sentence-by-sentence or a paragraph-by-paragraph.
 
Many people stopped Taxing your cognitive abilities since the use of ChatGPT, and now you want a perfect result from AI?
Lets the content be generated from ChatGPT, then a Human's touch should do the finishing touches.
 
Chatgpt content is good, but you should use it as an inspiration and rewrite/delete unnecessary words/phrases produced by it.
 
I have written 3 articles with chatGPT all pass for 100% human with any AI detection tool and about the percentage of duplicate content I dare you to pick any article on google page 1 and check for duplication percentage and also research any topic on google and check page 1 of google they all look like duplicates of each other.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top