Don't make this mistake...

pr0j3ctx said:

When creating accounts, people seem to be using the quickest way to get dozens of e-mails which also allows for easy e-mail confirms

Let me start off by saying that Facebook looks at every piece of information
The e-mail domain is one of the more important ones, as it can quickly tell something about the user

Don't make your own domain and register e-mails that way
Try to avoid mail.ru type of e-mails

Gmail.com is probably the best choice for Facebook
Why? It's highly recognized and used all around but here's probably one of the real reasons
Facebook knows that to even have a gmail, you have to pass Google's security

So you'd have to pass Google AND then also Facebook. It's a smart move on their part, if they even thought about it this way. They probably have, seeing how they are disabling fakes left and right

Use gmail.com/hotmail.com/..



I can't stress this enough, QUALITY MATTERS!

Click to expand...

redarrow said:

Hotmail a big problem as well for spam and microsoft own it .

Gmail is preferred because of security I agree

But so is yahoo and their security nothink to Gmail security.

It not just the email provider looked at it the IP that created the email from first place .

Try it....
If you use the badess
email provider known to man for facebook I guarantee with a new residential IP on the email with account created with it as well there be no ban.

It not just the email provider gives facebook bans or verification.

Knowing how to create email accounts properly with no footprints does contribute to none ban accounts.

IP is one footprint.
Browser another
Screen size another
Computer info another

Footprints contribute to bans.

There is no written info on any website that says a certain email provider is not allowed and that flaws your argument.

Click to expand...

kasher9 said:

Actually, I have masses of data to prove this wrong (having been through more than 2000 ad accounts now).

The way a catch-all domain should work is you set it up so that you use a domain which is aged.

The email address only helps if the other parts of your farming process are weak af.

Click to expand...

pr0j3ctx said:

You just admitted in your last sentence that it does attribute to gaining trust. And that's what it's about.

Click to expand...

kasher9 said:

Actually, on the contrary I said it only matters if other parts of your farming process are weak.

I also said you can use catchall correctly with aged domains.

In 2 sentences I've given more valuable info than your OP

Click to expand...

pr0j3ctx said:

"If". I made this to show people what helps and what doesn't. Saying you shouldn't do something because you've got it good enough already is ignorant and stupid.
This thread was intended for people who are looking to learn more about Facebook

At the least, you get some insight on HOW to think when it comes to Facebook from reading what I said

Feel free to use your own methods for this. And if you're going to be such an ass about it, why don't you show me what you earned last week? Lmao

Click to expand...

kasher9 said:

Are we ignoring the part where I said catchall work if they're aged? In fact they work even if you don't use an aged domain. My point was the other aspects of your farming process need to take precedence.

In a real life scenario, scaling with gmails is impossible for ads: either a) you need a good supplier or b) you need a va dedicated to churning out gmails. Both options have their drawbacks which I'm sure you already know.

It's ok to use gmails for managing a few accounts, but when you're managing a few hundred, thats where it gets problematic. You need one dedicated gmail to receive the emails (ad receipts) of all the gmails you have setup, and that alone is a flag for gmail. Fetching receipts manually from 100s of ad accounts is a pain, and it's almost impossible if the profile is banned.

I wasn't an ass at all, but sharing the wrong information is worse than sharing no info at all.

Re: earnings, I don't partake in such petty bs, nor would I ask anyone else to do so.

Anyway, I don't want to get into a fight, this section already lacks info, I would agree quality does matter.

Click to expand...

pr0j3ctx said:

How am I sharing wrong information here? And I don't think that you realize that I'm posting bits and pieces in this forum
Of course, the domain or your e-mail isn't a priority when managing and/or creating accounts
I'm not just randomly going to post my full methods on here. I just write posts on whatever I feel like writing at that moment, I don't profit from them at all nor do I expect to

Catchall works if you say so, but I haven't tested it. Also, I appreciate people sharing information because others read it and it becomes useful
I tend to make posts which change the way people think when they work with complex social media security

Facebook requires deeper thinking in order to outsmart them

Re: earnings, didn't expect you to do so but I felt like that was an easy response to your original "what I just said is better"

Click to expand...

kasher9 said:

Look man, I could write up a whole rant about how you just said you haven't even tested catch-alls - you can't really say something doesn't work if you haven't tested it.

But I won't. I'm glad your heart is in the right place.

Click to expand...

pr0j3ctx said:

I'm not in the account creation business. This is just from what I know.
Secondly, never said that it doesn't work? Please, let's avoid miscommunication by reading properly

Click to expand...

Erfan Piroze said:

gmail is better i think.

Click to expand...

mihai1497 said:

I don't know about facebook, but for Instagram, from our tests gmail is very good and it's way better compared to mail.ru

So the same thing is probably true for facebook.

Click to expand...