Does quality really matter on Web 2.0s?

samiejg

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
1,177
Reaction score
98
Hey guys,

Just a newbie here trying to understand stuff :) I'm actually considering purchasing some article writing services here on BHW, but my inquiry is... If I'm only using them for tiered link building on web 2.0s, and the articles are 100% unique, does the quality of writing in the articles really matter? And does the keywords/phrases really matter either?

It just doesn't make sense to me that any of this would matter, since the web 2.0 is just a placeholder to link to our money site, and pass link juice (through tier 2,3,spam,etc.)
 

Quality and Source of backlink matter a lot these days.

I wouldn't buy articles for my money site and use them in Web 2.0 though. I would buy only if used on an authority source.
 
Ya, if you get caught then you'll have an issue.

Other than that spam away with crappy content on the extra tiers.
 
Yes.. Quality article Links are the very Important to your site ..

Dont use Non Quality.. It will be big Problem to your site.
 
I use quality readable spun content on my lower tier sites. I mean, if you want them to last you gotta spend time on it.
 
Thanks everyone for the feedback. So it sounds like it doesn't matter what keywords and quality you have on your Web 2.0 as long as it will look suitable for a manual review by Google.

So this works for me then. I don't expect the articles will have have a bad quality to them, but you never know when buying cheaper article writing services online. I also was just not too sure what I should be providing for a niche/title to the writer, but by the sounds of it, it won't matter too much as long as it's somewhat related.
 
Really, Why..... beside the point of manual reviews, why are links comming from high quality content better then other links?


Yes.. Quality article Links are the very Important to your site ..

Dont use Non Quality.. It will be big Problem to your site.
 
When it comes to web2.0s, you are basically interested in making them last you as long as possible. So, do what would help it look more legit.
 
You need to be very consistent with managing your Web 2.0 - most people just give up or forget.
 
I have seem quality articles working with web 2.0. So my vote goes to quality articles only if you are pointing the web 2.0 to your money site
 
The 1 thing people always forget about spun content - you can only identify spun articles when they are done badly.

I have hundreds of properties with high quality spins, and no matter how hard you try, you can not tell that the articles are spun.

The downside is it takes about 30 hours for me to write 1 spintax. But they will last for years once they're up.
 
People use spun content for the same but i believe quality content and quality backlink is important for all the services these days.
 
People use spun content for the same but i believe quality content and quality backlink is important for all the services these days.

Yeah, but aside from the content being unique and dealing with manual reviews, nobody is even going to be seeing the "quality content" are they?

Like am I just able to target keywords/phrases that nobody searches for? but have the article link over to my money site? Would that work? Or do my keywords have to match to my money site or something?
 
quality of content can help your links building campaign look natural. If you are have high budget, then go for it. Othewise spun article work just well, but don't forget about manual reviews thingys.
 
Back
Top