People need to learn the difference between correlation and causation.
Don't just see that one thing happens, followed by another and jump to conclusions.
Yes number of clicks earned by ppc campaigns do matter when it comes to the boosting of website ranking.
This is a sweeping statement without any evidence used to back it up. Presumably we're just supposed to take your word for this?
In fact it does affect, i have been using only adwords for about 4 months for my local business site and i must say that without building any link at all my keywords started moving and some of them are top 20 and 30, getting traffic from paid keyword does affect rankings but only for good. ( My opinon based on my experience)
You're basing your comments off what you have seen, which is better than simply claiming something is fact without giving any supporting evidence - and you have clearly stated that this is your opinion. However, there are a huge range of other factors that could be causing the improvement in your rankings. Just to point out some;
- Your search terms might not be particularly competitive.
- Your site has not been online particularly long and so it is only now achieving its appropriate ranking position.
- Your onsite SEO and content might be really awesome compared to competitors.
- Perhaps no-one, or very few competitors have decent backlinks either.
- You might not have built backlinks, but perhaps you acquired them naturally.
- Perhaps you obtained some decent reviews that are helping.
This is just to point out that stating that adwords is responsible for the improvement in this situation is probably a little bold of a statement. Also, with respect, as
@KHer0 pointed out, position 20-30 is still not particularly high a ranking even if it has come from outside of the top 100 results.
It's very difficult to prove something like this without extensive evidence on multiple sites under test conditions with a control. Until someone does this and proves otherwise, I'll stick to the default view of accepting what Google say in this instance;
Why Won't AdWords PPC marketing help my SEO?
Google’s first responsibility is to provide Search users with the most relevant possible results. If businesses were able to pay for higher rankings in the search results, users wouldn’t be getting the information they’re looking for.
https://adwords.google.com/home/resources/seo-vs-ppc.html
Page exposure or click counts is one of ranking factors.
So, i am thinking:
even though ppc won't directly affect my rankings, but those clicks i got from ppc compaigns will eventually help my rankings one way or other, right?
I think it's more than reasonable to assume that CTR and onsite engagement factors contribute to site ranking in search. However, PPC and organic search are completely different departments at Google and there is no real benefit that I can see for them to improve your organic SEO if you're paying for Adwords. In fact, if anything it could be harmful to them because if people start ranking well organically they might stop PPC.
As others have said, there is quite likely an indirect impact of using PPC. PPC is good for giving exposure to your brand name and identity. If a potential customer clicks on your ad but doesn't purchase straight away, they may search directly for your brand next time and click on an organic listing. This not only increases the number of searches for your brand name (which will help Google see you as a brand - which they seem to favour), but should also improve your click through rates, which consequently
could improve your organic rankings.
I don't have extensive evidence either, but I have made the following observations;
- Advertising 3 brand new sites on Adwords at around £3k/month saw them perform well organically in a competitive niche with no link building efforts, just onsite SEO.
- Launched 3 more new sites several months later in the same niche and didn't advertise them using PPC - they showed the same level of improvement in organic search at around the same points as the previous 3.
- Stopped advertising the original 3 and saw no substantial decrease in organic ranking.
This leads me to believe that any increase in organic ranking is likely to simply be due to the indirect factors suggested above, rather than any direct correlation.