Real seo agancy
Newbie
- Sep 5, 2026
- 20
- 2
I still prefer relevance over metrics. A site with moderate DA/DR but genuine traffic and a strong connection to the niche can be more useful than a high-metric general site.
Yes, DA/DR still have some value as quick screening metrics, but I wouldn't make them the deciding factor.Have you thought about whether things like DR and DA matter anymore when it comes to selecting backlinks? Would you rather select a link from a site that is not so strong in terms of metrics but is related to your industry.
Yes, both would be perfect but only if the budget permits it. This way, you can take advantage of the strengths of both approaches and need not solely depend on one.It would be best if both of them were...
Yeah, me too. It is helpful as an initial filter, but I would be more concerned about the relevance of topics, traffic, and quality of the backlinks of the website.I’d go with the related site I still check DR and DA but they’re not the first thing I look at
100%. DR is simply a vanity metric that can be manipulated through spammy redirects anyway. Organic traffic movement and relevance to niche will always be more valuable than an inflated third-party score.while I would still employ DR/DA as my shortcut filter, it is definitely not the deciding factor for me – rather, a relevant site with some traffic nd a gud track record would suit me better.
Domain metrics like DR and DA matter much less today because they are easily manipulated with artificial link networks.Based on my experience auditing client portfolios, choosing a lower metric site with genuine topical relevance and organic traffic is always the safer choice.Focus on audience alignment and real traffic trends rather than vanity numbers to keep your strategy effective..Have you thought about whether things like DR and DA matter anymore when it comes to selecting backlinks? Would you rather select a link from a site that is not so strong in terms of metrics but is related to your industry.