Does GSA even work?
- Thread starter nuhll
- Start date
speedeagle
BANNED
- Mar 3, 2016
- 29
- 9
try in captcha service buddy
Ambitious12
Elite Member
- Jun 26, 2014
- 3,109
- 616
Yes it works better,I selected one of my very high PBN and run it on GSA and then I checked my keywords got top results.
There was a popular thread on this very forum just a few days ago where people discussed ranking sites using SER only. There were no advertisements for anything. The tool has a steep learning curve, and I get that you're frustrated, but taking this bad attitude isn't helping you.
Karla Sowards
Junior Member
- Mar 22, 2014
- 113
- 11
Ofcourse it works really well
I have most of the GSA programs.
I do not aim for high LPM, and I use GSA SER directly on money sites. I only get around 250 - 500 links per day, but that is what I am aiming for. For captcha solving I am using GSA Captha Breaker and no other service. For proxies I am using the scanner in SER. For scraping I use a combination of SER and Scrapebox with the SER footprints. I do not use paid lists.
Contrary to common advise, my experience is that SER scrapes more postable URLs than Scrapebox does. However, this could be the setting that I am using.
As an experiment, I am using a list I scraped of roughly 9,000,000 urls scraped with Scrapebox from Bing and Google, and posting to them via GScraper. For this I am using GSA Proxy Scraper to find the proxies, and using CB for captcha solving. GScraper is setup to skip posts if there are more than 25 OBL. In 12 hours 679,000 urls have been attempted to have been posted to, while 10,434 have been successful. I do not recommend that others use GScraper, and there are many reasons.
By way of contrast, I used a somewhat similar list and posted with SER. Out of 3 million URLs, there were only a few hundred successful posts. What does this mean? Absolutely nothing. GScraper posts garbage links to any unauthenticated form while SER post to authenticated forms.
So yes, GSA SER does work, or rather it will do the drudge work for you while requiring you to do the heavy lifting by using your mind to set it up. I limit any post made by GSA to less than 25 OBL and still get 250 - 500 links per day. But the difference is that I have experimented and found what works for the niches I post to.
I do not aim for high LPM, and I use GSA SER directly on money sites. I only get around 250 - 500 links per day, but that is what I am aiming for. For captcha solving I am using GSA Captha Breaker and no other service. For proxies I am using the scanner in SER. For scraping I use a combination of SER and Scrapebox with the SER footprints. I do not use paid lists.
Contrary to common advise, my experience is that SER scrapes more postable URLs than Scrapebox does. However, this could be the setting that I am using.
As an experiment, I am using a list I scraped of roughly 9,000,000 urls scraped with Scrapebox from Bing and Google, and posting to them via GScraper. For this I am using GSA Proxy Scraper to find the proxies, and using CB for captcha solving. GScraper is setup to skip posts if there are more than 25 OBL. In 12 hours 679,000 urls have been attempted to have been posted to, while 10,434 have been successful. I do not recommend that others use GScraper, and there are many reasons.
By way of contrast, I used a somewhat similar list and posted with SER. Out of 3 million URLs, there were only a few hundred successful posts. What does this mean? Absolutely nothing. GScraper posts garbage links to any unauthenticated form while SER post to authenticated forms.
So yes, GSA SER does work, or rather it will do the drudge work for you while requiring you to do the heavy lifting by using your mind to set it up. I limit any post made by GSA to less than 25 OBL and still get 250 - 500 links per day. But the difference is that I have experimented and found what works for the niches I post to.