Does Building Backlinks Increase Rankings?

Back when I first came up with the process I did it all manually. Now it is all automated. All I do is input the keywords I want to target, add my url and click a button and the linkpush is generated.

Which tool are you using; SERP Assist, SENuke
 
It's an application that is set up on my website that was built by my partner.
 
Never ever.

That creates a footprint as well as diminishing the power of the outbound links.

One outbound link per property is really the only way to go.

Regarding the single link on the hub; where on the page do you place the link (top, middle, bottom etc)?
Posted via Mobile Device
 
Typically the link is at the bottom as most of the article directories have things set up like that... they call it the resource box or the bio. It really does not matter as the backlinks will give the same juice no matter where they are on the page.
 
Does building backlinks increase rankings?

im kinda surprised people actually gave serious answers to this question. IMHO these are the kind of questions that belong on the Warrior Forum, not a reputable place like Black Hat World
 
Typically the link is at the bottom as most of the article directories have things set up like that... they call it the resource box or the bio. It really does not matter as the backlinks will give the same juice no matter where they are on the page.

I heard somewhere that having the link at the top is better...

Are you building these mininets on a keyword/page basis?

i.e. If you have a 25 page website and each page targets just one keyword. Do you then build one of these 'Link Push' mininets (basic or extended, whatever's needed) per page of your site so you'd end up with 25 mininets.

1) If this is so; do you ever place a link from one mininet to another?

2) I'm not talking about linking them all together so you have a giant 'mininet linkwheel' what I mean is say you have a profile you're building and you can place more than one link would you link this out to 2 mininets?
 
Are you building these mininets on a keyword/page basis?

i.e. If you have a 25 page website and each page targets just one keyword. Do you then build one of these 'Link Push' mininets (basic or extended, whatever's needed) per page of your site so you'd end up with 25 mininets.

If I have a 25 page site where each page targets a specific keyword, I'll build one for each inner page using that keyword.

1) If this is so; do you ever place a link from one mininet to another?

I don't do that and with the power of the linkpush process, you really do not need to do that.

2) I'm not talking about linking them all together so you have a giant 'mininet linkwheel' what I mean is say you have a profile you're building and you can place more than one link would you link this out to 2 mininets?

Nothing is interconnected with the linkpushes I build as it is not really necessary and once I build a linkpush, I literally forget about that particular one and move on to another one.

In that I rotate a lot of different accounts on a lot of different web 2.0 properties and article directories, the articles stay up as it appears that I am an active member in their system because I add articles on a regular basis.
 
In that I rotate a lot of different accounts on a lot of different web 2.0 properties and article directories, the articles stay up as it appears that I am an active member in their system because I add articles on a regular basis.

When you rotate your accounts do you add more than one page of content to each of your properties.

For example wordpress and blogger; when you're building your 'Linkpush Mininets' do you add a single article with your link or would they eventually have lots of posts/pages pointing out to your main sites?
 
In general we aim to have only on out bound link to each page from each Web 2.0 property. For instance for domain1.com, I would only have 1 link relating to a particular page on that site from blogger using one particular account.

A lot of different accounts makes it pretty random which is what you really need to keep things from generating a footprint.
 
In general we aim to have only on out bound link to each page from each Web 2.0 property. For instance for domain1.com, I would only have 1 link relating to a particular page on that site from blogger using one particular account.

A lot of different accounts makes it pretty random which is what you really need to keep things from generating a footprint.

So you build a web 2.0 property with one article which contains one anchor texted link pointing back to your main site and then move onto the next web2.0 property for this particular 'Linkpush Mininet.' When you then build your next 'Linkpush Mininet' you create a bunch of new web2.0 properties, in the same way with a load of new accounts, without using any that you built in the past, rotating the web2.0 property sites you use each time?

So every web 2.0 property is a single post site?
 
So every web 2.0 property is a single post site?

That is correct, if we use the same account on the same Web 2.0 property, we generate an entirely new post as opposed to adding to the current posts.
 
That is correct, if we use the same account on the same Web 2.0 property, we generate an entirely new post as opposed to adding to the current posts.


Is 6 web2.0 properties the standard amount to build for the baqsic 'Linkpush Mininet'?

Do you have a list of the web2.0 properties/ article directories you use and rotate through?
 
6 would be way too small... I use between 15 and 68 web 2.0 properties per linkpush. This pic shows the current sites we are using but that is just a part of the rotation as it changes on a regular basis to keep things random:

LinkPushingRisetothetopoftheSERPS_1291389898695.jpg
 
By 6 I was referring to the white circles on your profile image
 
Sorry, missed that. That number varies as well... sometimes it will be as few as 3 or as many as 12. Building one with six hubs and 20 or 25 feeder sites, varying the amount of feeder sites that each hub would have pushing it, is a nice linkpush and very effective.
 
Sorry, missed that. That number varies as well... sometimes it will be as few as 3 or as many as 12. Building one with six hubs and 20 or 25 feeder sites, varying the amount of feeder sites that each hub would have pushing it, is a nice linkpush and very effective.

No worries...

When you say vary between 3 & 12 are you referring to just the basic 'linkpush mininets' only or both basic and extended?

I'm assuming anything less than 6 would be for a basic 'linkpush mininet' however do you build as many as 12 for the basic, or just when you need to go after a more competitive keyword and need to add another level with the extended 'linkpush mininets'

So is the basic 'linkpush mininet' 3-6 or 3-12 white circles?

If this is all just for the basic how many do you build for an extended version of the 'linkpush mininet'?
 
That would be just for the basic... we vary the amount in order to keep from leaving any kind of footprint. In an extended linkpush I have has as many as 32 circles (hubs) and 170 rectangles (feeder sites).

The more competitive the keyword/keyword phrase the more expansive I will make a link push as well as making multiple linkpushes for the same keyword/keyword phrase.

More often than not, I'll build a small one with between 3 and 6 hubs and if after a few weeks, I do not see much movement in the search engines, I'll either add to it or build a few more small ones.
 
Got your email and had a read of your report and watched your website videos.

Are all those sites you list 'Do-Follow'?

Do you build this all in one day?

Also is the application you use to build these 'linkpush mininets' available?
 
The sites are generally do follow, but we do toss in teh occasional no follow because we want the link building to appear natural. It generally takes a couple of days for the push to be built and some of the article directories do not auto approve and they can take several days before they get approved.

We do not offer the application outside of the service as the automation of the process was coded specifically for our site by my business partner, Kevin.
 
Back
Top