Disclaimer: Clearly, I have a BST where I offer manual rewriting services. So naturally, I have a bias against article spinners.
Regardless of my bias, there's no changing the fact that article spinners are useful. Ordering tens of articles for web 2.0 properties, for other tier 2 and 3 properties and preparing articles for article directory submission can drive up your expenses really high. And if you're buying 'original' content below the rate of $5/500 words, 80% of the time you are actually buying a spun article that has been edited to read good. So why not spin content yourself?
Doing the spinning yourself is cost-effective, but you can't just leave it up to the article spinner. If pro writers with years of writing experience dedicate a substantial fraction of their time to proofreading and editing, there's no reason why you shouldn't do so when you use an automatic spinner.
Sure, it is time-consuming, but that's the caveat with the use of article spinners. You already have hundreds of spun variants, simply invest some time to make them readable at least.
Depending on the use of the rewrite, 'readable' is just fine. Sometimes however, there has to be flow and use of good grammar. That's where manual article spinners with decent thesauruses work well. You can change the structure of the content as well.
Summarily, if you're only after uniqueness, automatic spinners will do.
If you're after uniqueness and readability, automatic spinners and manual editing will do.
If you're after uniqueness, readability, and flow, manual spinners and light proofreading will do.
If you're after uniqueness, readability, flow as well as change in structure, style of writing; do the following. Read the article, comprehend what the article is about, then in your own words explicate the core idea behind the content. If this sounds like too much work, hire a pro rewriter.
In all fairness, I must add that spun content have no place on the webpages of your money site.
Regardless of my bias, there's no changing the fact that article spinners are useful. Ordering tens of articles for web 2.0 properties, for other tier 2 and 3 properties and preparing articles for article directory submission can drive up your expenses really high. And if you're buying 'original' content below the rate of $5/500 words, 80% of the time you are actually buying a spun article that has been edited to read good. So why not spin content yourself?
Doing the spinning yourself is cost-effective, but you can't just leave it up to the article spinner. If pro writers with years of writing experience dedicate a substantial fraction of their time to proofreading and editing, there's no reason why you shouldn't do so when you use an automatic spinner.
Sure, it is time-consuming, but that's the caveat with the use of article spinners. You already have hundreds of spun variants, simply invest some time to make them readable at least.
Depending on the use of the rewrite, 'readable' is just fine. Sometimes however, there has to be flow and use of good grammar. That's where manual article spinners with decent thesauruses work well. You can change the structure of the content as well.
Summarily, if you're only after uniqueness, automatic spinners will do.
If you're after uniqueness and readability, automatic spinners and manual editing will do.
If you're after uniqueness, readability, and flow, manual spinners and light proofreading will do.
If you're after uniqueness, readability, flow as well as change in structure, style of writing; do the following. Read the article, comprehend what the article is about, then in your own words explicate the core idea behind the content. If this sounds like too much work, hire a pro rewriter.
In all fairness, I must add that spun content have no place on the webpages of your money site.
