- Jun 20, 2015
- 5,334
- 898
Referred from: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/claude-rules-fake-sources-ai-answers/592456/
Have you checked the recent Anthropic update, its usage policy (effective Nov 12). You can no longer use Claude to build fake “independent” sites that push the same claims to influence search or AI answers. But it doesn’t change how AI picks or cites sources. It only limits what people can do with Claude. Real content and genuine mentions aren’t affected.
Could it indirectly help White hat? Maybe fewer fake source networks means cleaner sources for AI to pull from. That’s just my guess, the article doesn’t say it.
Have you checked the recent Anthropic update, its usage policy (effective Nov 12). You can no longer use Claude to build fake “independent” sites that push the same claims to influence search or AI answers. But it doesn’t change how AI picks or cites sources. It only limits what people can do with Claude. Real content and genuine mentions aren’t affected.
Could it indirectly help White hat? Maybe fewer fake source networks means cleaner sources for AI to pull from. That’s just my guess, the article doesn’t say it.
- Do you think this changes anything for AI citations, or is it just a policy on Claude users?
- Are fake source networks working for AI citations, or is it mostly hype?
- What’s actually getting you cited right now for you guys?
