Sugirl
Power Member
- Jun 12, 2010
- 621
- 556
When building out new large specific niches site that will have a lot of content ( 500+ Pieces) and you eventually plan to dominate/cover the whole niche.
Do you Target only the Low Hanging Fruit/Keywords at the start no one Has written anything about,
or go after every single keyword there is in the Niche disregarding the current competition (of course completely beating the competitor's articles in quality) ?
I know the common practice nowadays is to go after low-comp stuff which no1 has written about - It has worked fairly good for me as well and is a quick and easy way to get some traffic.
However...Can you really Gain The Topical Authority by skipping 90% of the stuff and only targeting the ultra-small stuff?
Obviously, I would want to rank one day for the high-comp stuff, however, I fully realize that there's no way to do that with a new site with 0 authority even if you have much better content.
So What do you do?
Only go after the Low hanging fruit, then after some years start covering the big stuff?
Or Cover everything from start + siloing everything properly. After all that is done you will have the largest topical authority on the subject out of everyone, and hope that with time the bigger stuff will also start to rank?
The obvious choice for long-term plan I guess is the 2nd one, however, is it really doable and is it possible to beat out the big guys solely by having the best content and the most Topical Authority?
With some random small website, I wouldn't bother as it would be impossible to rank for those terms ,you would only waste huge amounts of time and money,however what happens when we are talking about covering the whole niche?
Anyone have any Experience on this , in this kind of scale?
Do you Target only the Low Hanging Fruit/Keywords at the start no one Has written anything about,
or go after every single keyword there is in the Niche disregarding the current competition (of course completely beating the competitor's articles in quality) ?
I know the common practice nowadays is to go after low-comp stuff which no1 has written about - It has worked fairly good for me as well and is a quick and easy way to get some traffic.
However...Can you really Gain The Topical Authority by skipping 90% of the stuff and only targeting the ultra-small stuff?
Obviously, I would want to rank one day for the high-comp stuff, however, I fully realize that there's no way to do that with a new site with 0 authority even if you have much better content.
So What do you do?
Only go after the Low hanging fruit, then after some years start covering the big stuff?
Or Cover everything from start + siloing everything properly. After all that is done you will have the largest topical authority on the subject out of everyone, and hope that with time the bigger stuff will also start to rank?
The obvious choice for long-term plan I guess is the 2nd one, however, is it really doable and is it possible to beat out the big guys solely by having the best content and the most Topical Authority?
With some random small website, I wouldn't bother as it would be impossible to rank for those terms ,you would only waste huge amounts of time and money,however what happens when we are talking about covering the whole niche?
Anyone have any Experience on this , in this kind of scale?