Animals don't have the consciousness for right or wrong, we have. Moreover, We always weep and make noise for human rights but where are animal rights? IF its the rule of the jungle, it should be for all or should be for none.But usually, that doesn't happen. You will find a way to justify your logic and I will for mine.
Just can't help myself here. Females generally find the law coming down harder on them than male do. But, more important,What do you do about police abuse?
It is quite obvious that you will defend your belief irrespective of logic.
That's the point. Why shouldn't they? Whole world claims to protect the weak from powerful then what's the difference here?
Nope! Absolutely wrong.http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34899066
I believe that it's true and never found a single answer from your to prove it otherwise. So, why should i change my belief?
Now, I'm a sadist. WoW!Animals have the same right on this earth as we have, we all were once animals.What you are professing is the law of might is right, and if that's the case then I rest my case.
Why do we jail people for killing humans then? That was my first quote. Because we treat others (non-humans) as a piece of shit.
You may want to enrage you comrades with such language, but I'm for animal rights. Humans shouldn't have the right to kill others as others don't have to kill humans.
One who killed the animal should be punished. The term of sentence can be argued.
We live in a society and I'm not your president.
Cool, an article without any facts, just a number without any information to back it up OR to show that it is higher than what greenhouse gasses would be with just growing vegetables. Eating animals is absolutely required for humans in my opinion. It's not like we can just stop eating cows, chickens, and pigs and everything will be okay. We have largely eliminated their natural predators, so they would become completely over populated...
without fact? What? Really!Sorry, I didn't found anything approved by you LOL
I'm not trying to prove anything? Just stating a fact, your article has no facts in it that contribute to the argument of if eating meat creates more or less greenhouse gasses than if we all just decided to only eat vegetables.
If you would have read it properly, It cites a report from RIIA https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/changing-climate-changing-diets http://www.skepticalscience.com/how-much-meat-contribute-to-gw.html http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/mar/21/eat-less-meat-vegetarianism-dangerous-global-warming http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/eating-less-meat-essential-to-curb-climate-change-says-report http://www.livescience.com/53542-more-climate-negotiations-addressing-meat-consumption.html I can provide you various studies if you desire but my point was never about its effects. My point was about equal rights and morality.