artemis42
Regular Member
- Oct 5, 2015
- 334
- 86
I think he got pwned like crazy when he asked that dumb question.
Do you support non veg eating?
- Thread starter IAmNotATroller
- Start date
artemis42
Regular Member
- Oct 5, 2015
- 334
- 86
Where can I sign up for this?
Sounds good. I assume you would also agree to be the first sacrificial penguin.
rpkrocks
BANNED
- Feb 4, 2010
- 1,037
- 978
Why kill anyone? Humans cry on every little cut . Why then torture animals? That's just hypocrisy.
So you are unwilling to be the first human killed in your quest. Got it. All mouth and no go.
rpkrocks
BANNED
- Feb 4, 2010
- 1,037
- 978
I have no such quest. I value those whose pain and misery you seem to enjoy.
TheVigilante
Banned - Multiple Rules Violations
- Aug 31, 2010
- 14,993
- 16,105
We get so many benefits right?
Apparently you do have an agenda. You support humans killing animals for food if killing humans is also legal:
Are you changing your position?
For some silly reason you believe that pain and misery are not the font of humans and animals. Human are at the top of the food chain. It may not be right in your distorted belief structure, but it is what it is. You believe in harming others as long as you are not harmed in the process. You remind me of hoodlums that curb people after someone else knocks them out. May you one day be that person.
Last edited:
Paranoid Android
Elite Member
- Jun 20, 2010
- 2,864
- 4,209
It is NOT OK to kill animals. But if someone else has killed it already and if you enjoy the taste, why not eat it?
Ok. You support killing animals for food as long as you do not do it.
What is the difference between you killing an animal and paying someone else to kill the animal for you?
I hope someday you have the opportunity to work on a ranch where you are elbow deep in cow pussy delivering a breeched calf and later in the same day selling the bull you delivered three years earlier. You will quickly come to understand life and death.
Paranoid Android
Elite Member
- Jun 20, 2010
- 2,864
- 4,209
I pay for whats available. By the time I reach the restaurant the bull is already on the grill. I didn't order the killing. And I pay for food. If the restaurant says they aren't killing bulls today I'd settles for plant products.
CashMoneyMantra
Registered Member
- Feb 25, 2016
- 66
- 86
Let's face it, you'd not go to the restaurant. It's practically a vegan rebranding if the restaurant decides to no longer serve meat, and that wouldn't be as good a business as the one selling meat and veg, because only the militant vegans would refuse to eat anywhere that served meat.
It's supply and demand, the reason why there is structural demand for meat is because humans are predators, and the eating of meat facilitated our evolution into what we are now and it's never stopped because it's globally cultural.
That bull on the grill would not be there if it were not for your culinary pleasure. By eating said bull, you are condoning its killing and taking a direct, if removed, part in its death for dinner.
Face facts. Dump the ideology.
Paranoid Android
Elite Member
- Jun 20, 2010
- 2,864
- 4,209
Dude, that chicken was born to be on my plate. If people stop eating meat that chicken wouldn't have been born in the first place. Even if it was destined to have a life and be born, it would probably have been on the wild and might have had to cross the road making people wonder why and get run over by a truck and become food to bacteria and worms. Get the suppliers to stop fulfilling the demand. If its ready to be served in 20 minutes I'll probably order it.
rpkrocks
BANNED
- Feb 4, 2010
- 1,037
- 978
Personal ridicule will not get you anything but frustration. So, please calm down.
I'm very clear; Humans are hypocrites. They want to kill animals for fun but hate when the same is done to them.
I know how people will respond when such a suggestion is put out in the open. Thus, it's entirely necessary to point that out.
This is equality. If humans are not allowed to be killed, why animals? You can create thousand of words for horrible acts based upon pride and whatnot, but the truth doesn't change.
You may call it "agenda." Murdering others for power and control is also "agenda."
I dislike that.
Thank you
Rpkrocks
Personal ridicule? No. Pointing out the flaws in your logic. I am also pointing out that you are unwilling to subject yourself to your own asserted actions.
rpkrocks
BANNED
- Feb 4, 2010
- 1,037
- 978
Seriously, "You remind me of hoodlums" is such lovely praise. OMG!
Anyways, where is the point of subjecting me comes from?
I have voted NO in the poll and continue to make the argument that NO one should be killed. The point of making that point was to point that humans don't like to them what they do to others. Is that, that hard to understand? Or you just want confrontation for nothings sake?
I hope you understand that every life is precious and not love the merciless murder of little animals. We were once animals too.
Thank you
Rpkrocks
umerjutt00
Elite Member
- Oct 28, 2011
- 4,373
- 2,493
New research from the University of Missouri finds that the vegetables in your salad bowl aren't exactly living the life of Riley. Those veggies can actually hear themselves being eaten and mount a defense against the attack.
http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/07/07/eating-your-vegetables-might-not-be-cruelty-free
Stop eating vegetables... Its cruel!
http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/07/07/eating-your-vegetables-might-not-be-cruelty-free
Stop eating vegetables... Its cruel!
BreaknBrix
Power Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 778
- 4,523
I'm not a member of PETA but I support them and people need to understand they do some important shit.
It's not the killing that bothers me. It's the abuse that seems to happen on larger commercial farms. And the overall lack of transparency. For instance, I don't like that people need to sneak cameras into massive slaughter houses to uncover hundreds of cases of inhumane killing on 1 farm.
So the only real complaint I have... I think it should be a law that all slaughter houses are required to have cameras that are streamed online where the public can freely watch how their food is killed. It wouldn't cost a lot of money. It would weed out all the sick fucks who like to torture animals. And if employees simply knew this was being done it would be a great deterrent for abuse.
It's not the killing that bothers me. It's the abuse that seems to happen on larger commercial farms. And the overall lack of transparency. For instance, I don't like that people need to sneak cameras into massive slaughter houses to uncover hundreds of cases of inhumane killing on 1 farm.
So the only real complaint I have... I think it should be a law that all slaughter houses are required to have cameras that are streamed online where the public can freely watch how their food is killed. It wouldn't cost a lot of money. It would weed out all the sick fucks who like to torture animals. And if employees simply knew this was being done it would be a great deterrent for abuse.
That is the point. You fail to understand some of use that believe humans belong in the food chain as both predator and prey. You can't deal with that and you fail to understand that a pure vegetarian diet would cause more harm than you imagine ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...tarian-does-harm-environment-eating-meat.html ). The first of those is that starvation and poverty would increase. This would have the effect of decimating humans throughout the world. The next is that pollution, global warming (if such actually exists) and petrochemical use would increase ( http://www.sciencealert.com/vegetar...ally-be-worse-for-the-environment-study-finds). We could go on and on, but why?
Last edited: