i would not use the faq schema for ranking purposes anymore. it can certainly assist google to comprehend the page yet the FAQ rich result visibility has become very limited in comparison with before. i would use the schema for ranking but only if the FAQ is really usefful to the user.Is it still important? I still implement it just in case, but I heard that google stops favouring it now.
FAQ schema is no longer the same for SEO purpose. If using it will make the FAQ page more beneficial for visitors, then I do utilize it but not at the top of my list.Is it still important? I still implement it just in case, but I heard that google stops favouring it now.
Yeah, yeah I agree that a lot of old methods are no longer effective, but at least having proper structure, quality content and some SEO hygiene will help to keep things healthy.It depends on how you define it, but to me, most traditional SEO techniques are not primarily, meant for ranking anymore. I still use the basic SEO because it helps the search engine, understand the site and avoid any problems in the future.
FAQ schema is still a great practice, if it works for your site, but I doubt that it will be able to rank as before. In my personal experience, FAQ schema ranks due to the answer.Is it still important? I still implement it just in case, but I heard that google stops favouring it now.
However, if you refer to a certain SEO practice, then I would keep it if it helps increase usability and clarity instead of boosting rankings. This is because Google keeps changing the way it evaluates signals, but helpful practices for a website never become useless.Is it still important? I still implement it just in case, but I heard that google stops favouring it now.
Faq schema is not the magic ranking button it used to be, but it's not useless either. The real win is creating helpful answers for users first. Schema just help google understand the content.Is it still important? I still implement it just in case, but I heard that google stops favouring it now.