Diversifying Web 2.0's?

Hello,

Recently got started with GSA, Scrapebox...etc. For the last month or so I've been building up 8 different Web 2.0's. Hand written articles by me, with videos and images to make it look natural along with GSA linkbuilding.

Each blog has approx 300 links now, they're all indexed by Google/Bing/Yahoo, and my money site is indexed too. I'm happy with the stats via Ahrefs, I believe my links are more powerful than my competitors, and my onpage is good.

I'm ready to start drip feeding my Web 2.0 links, but what I hadn't realised is how I diversify my anchor texts. In this scenario, my Web 2.0's will be my power links as I don't have a PBN (I don't think my niche needs it to be honest - competitors don't have web 2's or PBN's).

I could use some of my Web 2.0 properties as branded links or naked URL, but I feel like this is a bit of a waste. If my calculations are correct, usually an anchor is around 1% of total links, so in order to use all of my Web 2.0's I would need 90 other links using branded, generic or naked url.

Am I correct in this line of thought?

Just use all naked URLs.
Getting Google to your site from a good neighborhood is more important then what text the link is, let the spiders figure out what your site is about, they will anyways.

Naked is the future, big companies with high authority are only doing mostly naked links now ... Google has figured out keyword links are questionable at most and radioactive at best.

Since you have gone the teir 2 route do not make many peoples mistake and not keep them active with fresh content and a new link out a month or so so your sandbox is fair and your neighborhood is strong. You can even link out to a big company they wont notice lol Keep it all contextual.

Thanks for your replies, that makes my life a lot easier. I do believe the Web 2.0 sites will remove blogs that are inactive, at least some of them on my list do. I'll make sure after I drop my money site I'll post a blog once a month or so. Cheers for the info