Did you put spinned articles in you PBN blogs network?

THUNDERELVI said:

People posting shit here on this thread have never even done any testing of their own. If they did, they would know that spun content works perfectly fine AS LONG AS the spintax article generates completely readable articles with 90%+ uniqueness (between the articles). Such a very high quality spintax article cannot be done with any automated tool, it requires hours of manual tedious soul-crushing work, so you would outsource it of course. Here is the cost/benefit analysis for both approaches:

1) Unique articles - 3$ each min, readable and passes manual review. For a network consisting of 100 PBN-s, the cost will be $300 just to write 1 "money site" article (where you link to your sites). If you wanna leave your PBN-s with just these kind of posts and no other filler articles, then there are no more costs in this aspect.

However, you are completely vulnerable to a manual review, because a reviewer (and any 5-year old kid for that matter) will immediately flag your network (or whatever sites from the network that he found) within 5 minutes. Don't get me wrong, I have sites ranking with crappy PBN-s just like these and have also found other guys (lots of them) ranking with such low quality PBN-s for tons of keywords. All of us got lucky that we haven't been reviewed yet, but such PBN-s are timed bombs, that can never explode or explode someday in the near future.

Now, if you post other filler articles as well to reduce footprints, you would post at least an article per month per site. So, again for an 100-site network, you will have $300 extra cost per month. If you write articles every other month, the cost drops 2x to $150 per month. So, to recap, total cost is:

$300 for each money-site article you write!
$150/month min to maintain your sites!
These costs are calculated by keeping in mind that you can find decent writers to write readable articles for $3 each (~ 500 words). 99% of such writers that will take the bid for such low prices write like they learnt English yesterday, so most of the times, you will have to put in serious efforts to find the writers and you might also end up spending more money in the process of testing them.

2) HQ spun articles - to generate a spintax article that produces hundreds of different variations completely readable able to pass manual reviews AND with 90%+ uniqueness between the variations, you are looking at a cost of $70-100 per spintax article if you outsource it in the SEO forums' marketplaces. If you outsource it in-house, depending on where you live, the cost can go as low as $50 per article (I have managed to do this myself).

Now, this kind of spintax article can populate ALL of the sites in your network, so it will only cost you $100 (taking the upper bound) for 100 sites in the network. The more sites you have in the network, the lower the cost per site article is. Of course, there is a limit to how many variations you can produce without degrading the uniqueness level, but with a HUGE HQ spintax article, you are looking at hundreds of variations with no sweating at all.
To maintain the networks, the cost will be $100 per month if you write each month and $50 per month if you write every other month.

So, to recap, the total cost is:
$100 for each money-site article you write!
$50 min to maintain your sites!

As you can see, the total cost is AT LEAST 3x less if you use spun articles. The benefit is the same. You will sleep properly at night as well if you use proper spun readable & unique articles. The risk is the same in both approaches. So, why the fuck should you use "unique" garbage articles written by people who translate most of the words anyway?! The whole "content is king" & "use unique handwritten articles only for PBN-s/web 2.0-s" is yet another myth and misinformation in the world of SEO. If someone gives you this kind of shit propaganda again, direct them to this post and shut their mouth up!!!

Click to expand...

lemon said:

the time spent crafting high quality content for your PBN is significantly less than the time you'll have to spend rebuilding your PBN after it gets penalized.

Click to expand...

Hawkster said:

Lol this post should have a thread of its own. Infact i think you should do that to create some more discussion on the subject.

Click to expand...

THUNDERELVI said:

You are right, but I don't think I can handle all the people who will come to the thread and start preaching again the same "use unique handwritten articles only" crap. And then, there are those members who just try to increase their post count by repeating what other members have said in the previous posts without even having an idea of what the fuck they are writing about. All people that do SEO and test for themselves know this, the cost of maintaining your networks by using HQ spun content is extremely many times less (3x that I calculated above was just the lower bound) than if you would use handwritten content and it works perfectly! I'm done convincing noobs lol, they can go follow Neil Patel & get a certificate from Matthew Woodward all day long.

Click to expand...

THUNDERELVI said:

People posting shit here on this thread have never even done any testing of their own. If they did, they would know that spun content works perfectly fine AS LONG AS the spintax article generates completely readable articles with 90%+ uniqueness (between the articles). Such a very high quality spintax article cannot be done with any automated tool, it requires hours of manual tedious soul-crushing work, so you would outsource it of course. Here is the cost/benefit analysis for both approaches:

1) Unique articles - 3$ each min, readable and passes manual review. For a network consisting of 100 PBN-s, the cost will be $300 just to write 1 "money site" article (where you link to your sites). If you wanna leave your PBN-s with just these kind of posts and no other filler articles, then there are no more costs in this aspect.

However, you are completely vulnerable to a manual review, because a reviewer (and any 5-year old kid for that matter) will immediately flag your network (or whatever sites from the network that he found) within 5 minutes. Don't get me wrong, I have sites ranking with crappy PBN-s just like these and have also found other guys (lots of them) ranking with such low quality PBN-s for tons of keywords. All of us got lucky that we haven't been reviewed yet, but such PBN-s are timed bombs, that can never explode or explode someday in the near future.

Now, if you post other filler articles as well to reduce footprints, you would post at least an article per month per site. So, again for an 100-site network, you will have $300 extra cost per month. If you write articles every other month, the cost drops 2x to $150 per month. So, to recap, total cost is:

$300 for each money-site article you write!
$150/month min to maintain your sites!
These costs are calculated by keeping in mind that you can find decent writers to write readable articles for $3 each (~ 500 words). 99% of such writers that will take the bid for such low prices write like they learnt English yesterday, so most of the times, you will have to put in serious efforts to find the writers and you might also end up spending more money in the process of testing them.

2) HQ spun articles - to generate a spintax article that produces hundreds of different variations completely readable able to pass manual reviews AND with 90%+ uniqueness between the variations, you are looking at a cost of $70-100 per spintax article if you outsource it in the SEO forums' marketplaces. If you outsource it in-house, depending on where you live, the cost can go as low as $50 per article (I have managed to do this myself).

Now, this kind of spintax article can populate ALL of the sites in your network, so it will only cost you $100 (taking the upper bound) for 100 sites in the network. The more sites you have in the network, the lower the cost per site article is. Of course, there is a limit to how many variations you can produce without degrading the uniqueness level, but with a HUGE HQ spintax article, you are looking at hundreds of variations with no sweating at all.
To maintain the networks, the cost will be $100 per month if you write each month and $50 per month if you write every other month.

So, to recap, the total cost is:
$100 for each money-site article you write!
$50 min to maintain your sites!

As you can see, the total cost is AT LEAST 3x less if you use spun articles. The benefit is the same. You will sleep properly at night as well if you use proper spun readable & unique articles. The risk is the same in both approaches. So, why the fuck should you use "unique" garbage articles written by people who translate most of the words anyway?! The whole "content is king" & "use unique handwritten articles only for PBN-s/web 2.0-s" is yet another myth and misinformation in the world of SEO. If someone gives you this kind of shit propaganda again, direct them to this post and shut their mouth up!!!

Click to expand...

shimi said:

Thank for all for sharing your thoughts! I know that we all use the spun for web2.0 so i have doubt about PBN service i want to make.

I will happy to hear your opinion:

I want to offer PBN network that up to 10 people can use every 1 PBN
Like every PBN will have 5-7 blog with different hosting etc... etc..

I have 2 ways, and i will happy to hear from you what you choose.

way 1
To give users to send spun articles + links from system that send all articles to all blogs
It will cost less and also less time - you take spun article - send 1 time and all articles will sended

way 2
To allow users send only original articles blogs
It will cost more, but it will be more secure...

way 3
Maybe to make above both ways and people choose which PBN network they prefer to be, because some people like PBN for sell links to others, so way 1 will help them to earn fast and easy... and some prefer the secure way that more expensive but not expensive as to build themself and use it alone.

Which way you think it best?

Thanks
Shimon

Click to expand...

mzonas said:

I run 4 networks:

Network 1 - unreadable content, mass post, works great for churn and burn, launch jacks, tier 2 and even money sites (if done right). Requires replacement of a few domains every now and then.

Network 2 - unique and original content. I bought fresh domains, built tons of links and now they average at 25 TF. Very powerful, I use this for my money sites to rank for long term.

Network 3-4 - slightly spun content. I bought expired domains with CF/TF 15+. Works great, when posted to 20 blogs in one day, I usually see results within 2-3 days.

In my opinion, spun content/original content works well for different projects. If it's just churn and burn project, run as many links as you can with unreadable cotent, rank, make money, tank, rinse and repeat.

Unique and original content posts work best for me when I want to preserve long term rankings for my power money sites, official websites (where I sell services, for example).

Thanks, I hope it helps.

Click to expand...

Djwillster123 said:

i outsource my articles

Click to expand...