You are right. I use the playground to make high quality long-form articles.Yes, I have been extensively testing how google reacts to various quality levels of AI content.
One-shot ChatGPT articles are more often than not seen as thin content. Just providing AI with a title and getting it to write a full article isn't a long term strategy.
I moved from ChatGPT to exclusively using the OpenAI playground, and spend a lot of time experimenting with advanced prompts, and tweaking other settings.
It is possible to get AI to write human level content, but takes a lot of work and constant training.
Yes, I have been extensively testing how google reacts to various quality levels of AI content.
One-shot ChatGPT articles are more often than not seen as thin content. Just providing AI with a title and getting it to write a full article isn't a long term strategy.
I moved from ChatGPT to exclusively using the OpenAI playground, and spend a lot of time experimenting with advanced prompts, and tweaking other settings.
It is possible to get AI to write human level content, but takes a lot of work and constant training.
At what point do you know that the article you made is human-like enough to publish?
I don't understand the question... I read it. AI content is usually very one dimensional, and I use 5+ different prompt templates per article to remove this mechanical footprint.
Well I mean that at some point you need to stop editing the AI content and publish it hoping that it's good enough for Google. I guess you're just using your gut feeling, thought maybe there's some other way
At the time the article has a deep feeling and conscience.At what point do you know that the article you made is human-like enough to publish?