Design of artificial intelligence must read

Discussion in 'BlackHat Lounge' started by Anthony2013, Aug 27, 2013.

  1. Anthony2013

    Anthony2013 Newbie

    Aug 27, 2013
    Likes Received:
    Design of artificial intelligence must read

    [1 paradox]Why 0.999... is not equal to 1?

    Written in 2012

    The current mathematic theory tells us, 1>0.9, 1>0.99, 1>0.999, ..., but at last it says 1=0.999..., a negation of itself (Proof 0.999... =1: 1/9=0.111..., 1/9x9=1, 0.111...x9=0.999..., so 1=0.999...). So it is totally a paradox, name it as 【1 paradox】. You see this is a mathematic problem at first, actually it is a philosophic problem. Then we can resolve it. Because math is a incomplete theory, only philosophy could be a complete one. The answer is that 0.999... is not equal to 1. Because of these reasons:

    1. The infinite world and finite world.

    We live in one world but made up of two parts: the infinite part and the finite part. But we develop our mathematic system based on the finite part, because we never entered into the infinite part. Your attention, God is in it.

    0.999... is a number in the infinite world, but 1 is a number in the finite world. For example, 1 represents an apple. But then 0.999...? We don't know. That is to say, we can't use a number in the infinite world to plus a number in the finite world. For example, an apple plus an apple, we say it is 1+1=2, we get two apples, but if it is an apple plus a banana, we only can say we get two fruits. The key problem is we don't know what is 0.999..., we can get nothing. So we can't say 9+0.999...=9.999... or 10, etc.

    We can use "infinite world" and "finite world" to resolve some of zeno's paradox, too.

    2. lim0.999...=1, not 0.999...=1.

    3.The indeterminate principle.

    Because of the indeterminate principle, 1/9 is not equal to 0.111....

    For example, cut an apple into nine equal parts, then every part of it is 1/9. But if you use different measure tools to measure the volume of every part, it is indeterminate. That is to say, you may find the volume could not exactly be 0.111..., but it would be 0.123, 0.1142, or 0.11425, etc.

    Now we end a biggest mathematical crisis. But most important is this standpoint tells us, our world is only a sample from a sample space. When you realized this, and that the current probability theory is wrong, when you find the Meta-sample-space, you would be able to create a real AI-system. It will indicate that there must be one God-system in the system, which is the controller. Look our world, there must be one God, as for us, only some robots. Maybe we are in a God's game, WHO KNOWS?


    More infos, download txt files from:

    Attached Files:

  2. solomayne

    solomayne Newbie

    Aug 14, 2013
    Likes Received:
    Umm... what??

    All i can tell you is this:

    a derivative work cannot equal the original unless it comprises the entirety of the original. furthermore, the derivative must have the exact same ability to recreate and reproduce itself.

    Hence, unless the computer has all the knowledge or ability to grow, think and to adapt like a human, It will be one step closer, but it also must be able to feel, to be influenced by emotions which effects on reasoning have not yet been thoroughly analyzed. As such, if a computer were to be made and it is truly AI,

    then the computer must possess all of the abilities of the original. Hence, the computer must be able to produce another AI machine on its own.

    In this lies the paradox.

    The knowledge which is placed in most AI machines are derivative of what we can program so far, such as complex equations, and reasoning. This alone will make a good probability machine, and an okay game player on jeopardy,
    but this alone is woefully inadequate.

    The computer cannot feel, because the computer cannot truly think yet. Its a series of switches, of zeros and ones. It is not yet able to dream.

    These computers have a long way to go from being AI by a human standard.

    Perhaps by the standard of a lesser animal such as a mouse, etc.

    But the human brain is constantly changing, and can grow in size over time.

    The computer is just not there yet.... End blathering rant.
  3. theseodude

    theseodude Regular Member

    Jun 25, 2012
    Likes Received:
    time to smoke another joint.
  4. impishme84

    impishme84 Junior Member

    May 10, 2013
    Likes Received:
    Content Writer
    I did not understand a single word of what you said and what purpose it is going to solve.
  5. FBGuru

    FBGuru Senior Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    Likes Received:
    Personality Type : ESTP
    It has all the secrets to find out the exact reason why you bumped this pretty old thread.

    Other than that, It's a spam post. Better let it die.