Dennica's Method To Rank in Google

First Lets go with the On Page...

per page, i use maximum of 2 keywords

Title Format
Keyword 1 | Keyword 2 | Brand

Description
Just add your 2 keywords in content
Keyword 1 - description ... keyword 2 .. description

Content
Put h1 tag on keyword 1
Put h2 tag on keyword 2

Repeat keywords once on the content.

Also, add unique content on your site 2-3 times a week

Before you build links, you must know that there are several factors why you outrank or does not outrank your competitor..
And you should know these factors

1. link profile - type of links sources, what type of links you are making - ******** or no follow, obl, domain pr and page pr, link age,..
2. age - domain age, page age..
3. honeymoon effect - happen to new sites.. usually use by loan niches. use this when you want to rank easily and does not focus on your stick rate...
4. link velocity - if you just started building links, build links slowly.. not in bulk.. build backlinks everyday..
5. and some other factors that im not allowed to share

For the newbies, make sure you know these factors listed above before you start on your seo campaign.
Those are prerequisites..

Build links upto tier4s.. make sure you put 1 link only per page..

Tier1
home page link - 1-3 links/day
subpage link - 1-3 links/day
unique or spun private blog network posting - 10-20 post/day
unique or spun guest posting - 10-20 post/day

forum post and web2s - optional.. i think im allowed to share this info.. web2s links will tell Google that you have done seo on your site... this is what we called special factor.. so its for you to believe or not.. most of you guys get links from web2s that are heavily spam already... the free ones have high risk.. what i mean is that these forum post and web2s have high risk which you dont know yet.. so i avoid my sites getting hit by special factors..

why unique or spun?
- we always get same results using unique or spun... so far.. we get better results using spun.. spun have more uniqueness than using original content. Google have ways to find uniqueness of your content.. does using orignal content have better uniqueness using spun article?

- top 4 link sources mention above have high stick rate.... always avoid getting links that are not permanent.. link velocity and link stick rate is a huge factor....

- you might say that seo is getting expensive.. thats what google wants... so that seo clients will use adwords...

do you mean post on free blogging sites and forum posting can penalize you for special factor?

Description don't have any effect on SERPs though, so why not make a decription which will increase CTR% instead?

What do you mean with this: "3. honeymoon effect - happen to new sites.. usually use by loan niches. use this when you want to rank easily and does not focus on your stick rate..."

Btw I love you end your post with a conspiracy statement:
"- you might say that seo is getting expensive.. thats what google wants... so that seo clients will use adwords..."

Nice Infos. Defenetly helpful for newbies.
and i think unique is always better than spun at least for information blogs.

That's a good strategy and SEO really isn't that expensive if you have the tools and resources.

saw this on my sites. have several sites in similar fields. sites with seo are for the most part doing worse than the non seo sites. also, didn't do seo on blogs and the blogs now rank higher for some of my kw's.

will give a try for my new site , will update how that goes through!

cheers OP!

Will give it a shot , will reprt bCk

johny022 said:

do you mean post on free blogging sites and forum posting can penalize you for special factor?

Click to expand...

yes thats right..

rasmusk said:

Description don't have any effect on SERPs though, so why not make a decription which will increase CTR% instead?

What do you mean with this: "3. honeymoon effect - happen to new sites.. usually use by loan niches. use this when you want to rank easily and does not focus on your stick rate..."

Btw I love you end your post with a conspiracy statement:
"- you might say that seo is getting expensive.. thats what google wants... so that seo clients will use adwords..."

Click to expand...

for my personal experience, description matters....

i have tried this before... when i add a keyword on the description, it boost the keyword ranking...

About honeymoon effect, you tend to rank faster if you get sudden amount of backlinks for newly made sites... G thinks that your site get viral.. after few days, the rank will drop..

but if you have reach top 1 for 3 days, that huge income already for that type of niche..

If your website is new, most people will say that you try to get 10 backlinks a day. They say this is to make it look more natural. There is no limit on how many backlinks you get since Google will not index them all at the same time. Backlinks are important but rather focus on the quality. The quantity and how fast you get them is not really as important.

if you can buy 500+ articles for your links.. i guess you can go for quality...

Well its a fact that descriptions have no effect on rankings in SERPs.

Thanks for your method buddy,
Althought I have to disagree with about the web2.0 stuff. I'm ranking multiple websites using web2.0 and they are doing very well.
Survived the penguin 2.0, even gained rankings.
I don't know how you came to that conclusion, do you have a link to the topic or a case study (althought the way you mentionned it makes it seem a bit of a secret)
Anyway good share !

ficfroc said:

Thanks for your method buddy,
Althought I have to disagree with about the web2.0 stuff. I'm ranking multiple websites using web2.0 and they are doing very well.
Survived the penguin 2.0, even gained rankings.
I don't know how you came to that conclusion, do you have a link to the topic or a case study (althought the way you mentionned it makes it seem a bit of a secret)
Anyway good share !

Click to expand...

probable you are working with non competitive keywords.....

we mostly work and test on medium to competitive keywords...

for non competitive keywords, we only need 10 good backlinks to rank it...

ficfroc said:

Thanks for your method buddy,
Althought I have to disagree with about the web2.0 stuff. I'm ranking multiple websites using web2.0 and they are doing very well.
Survived the penguin 2.0, even gained rankings.
I don't know how you came to that conclusion, do you have a link to the topic or a case study (althought the way you mentionned it makes it seem a bit of a secret)
Anyway good share !

Click to expand...

+1, even i have some sites ranking for medium competitive keywords mostly with web 2.0 sites. Link and anchor text diversity is key after the Penguin update.

hey, thanks for replying.

Well maybe you are right for the keyword competition. I'm lucky enought to have found non competitive and nice cash making ones.
I do beleive that for highly competitive keywords web2.0 won't be enought at all.
However I'm much more interested about the fact that web 2.0 are sending "seo building" signals to google. i've never heard it before and wish you could dump a link to a thread or an article about it.

Cheers.

dennica said:

probable you are working with non competitive keywords.....

we mostly work and test on medium to competitive keywords...

for non competitive keywords, we only need 10 good backlinks to rank it...

Click to expand...

lover said:

+1, even i have some sites ranking for medium competitive keywords mostly with web 2.0 sites. Link and anchor text diversity is key after the Penguin update.

Click to expand...

i have to agree.. anchor diversity is one of the factors you should look into also...

but for the web2, its just a warning anyway..

all i can say is that when you rank with web2s, i guess that keyword is not competitive at all from my experience...

ficfroc said:

hey, thanks for replying.

Well maybe you are right for the keyword competition. I'm lucky enought to have found non competitive and nice cash making ones.
I do beleive that for highly competitive keywords web2.0 won't be enought at all.
However I'm much more interested about the fact that web 2.0 are sending "seo building" signals to google. i've never heard it before and wish you could dump a link to a thread or an article about it.

Cheers.

Click to expand...

as i have remembered, it was around 30+ of us who test it. 10 websites each...

anyways, its just a warning anyway. thats why i term it special factor..

Alright thank you mate !