1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Creating Manual Web 2.0s

Discussion in 'White Hat SEO' started by adam11soccer, Nov 8, 2012.

  1. adam11soccer

    adam11soccer Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Im wondering how I can properly create manual web 2.0s. I've made 2.0s on wordpress and weebly and blogspot. Will google be able to track that I've created all these myself. I plan to make these mini authority sites with alot of posts, then social bookmark all the posts from those tier 2. Are there any problems with this? Thanks in advance.
     
  2. Adam718

    Adam718 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    433
    Occupation:
    Freelance writer and SEO Specialist
    Location:
    NYC
    That's one of the best link building methods there is. Use different IP's to make each web 2.0 property and you should be fine!

    Good luck!
     
  3. SkyrocketSEO

    SkyrocketSEO Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    11,257
    Occupation:
    travəlɪŋ
    Location:
    Aibres
    Home Page:
    In a few months this Web 2.0 linking will be slaped by Google, wait and see. You think they're not reading the forums?
    And, how is this White Hat SEO?
     
  4. educatedfool

    educatedfool Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    533
    Location:
    Silicon City Of India
    I think, he hasn't mentioned to which sites he linked those web 2.0s to, so maybe google will not hit the whole portal just for one site. And again, he didn't buy the links, instead he created them himself. At least they will think of their own blogspot and of course wordpress cos of the authority. All these sites help big G in generating some revenue indirectly, so no harm unless he follows Adam718's advice of using different IPs to make it more natural along with different usernames and anchor diversity, forgetting that he himself created them and make the SE giant assume someone liked his site and linked it to their web 2.0.

     
  5. kappa84

    kappa84 Power Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    736
    Likes Received:
    334
    Location:
    Bath, UK
    You know it for sure, right? :7:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  6. rugbyjack2005

    rugbyjack2005 Power Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Seriously or are you just trolling? I think it's going to be quite the opposite especially with all the hype about author rank. There is nothing wrong with writing good articles and putting a link in them back to your money site as a reference where applicable. What's more likely is that the good web 2.0 sites will tighten up on what they accept and spammy web 2.0s will be taken down...

    There is nothing to suggest a particular type of link will cause a penalty and why would there ever be. Penalties are given for unnatural link building and link profiles. E.g. low link diversity and anchor text diversity will cause a penalty. Rubbish links just get taken down or deindexed
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. SkyrocketSEO

    SkyrocketSEO Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    4,346
    Likes Received:
    11,257
    Occupation:
    travəlɪŋ
    Location:
    Aibres
    Home Page:
    So, if you create 200 WEB 2.0 links just to increase the number of your backlinks that's not rubish?
    The same thing was with the "high quality" article directories. "We only accept quality articles..." bla bla bla...And where are those sites now? Low link diversity is cause a penalty today and it will cause in the days,months,tears to come...but, that's not connected with WEB 2.0 Everybody is doing WEB 2.0 now but that's gonna stop, this thing can't last forever, you're not offering any relevant information, you're just building links, who cares about those links. Sure, Opera (for example) have a PR9 so what? No one will visit your profile, noone will click on your link, no body gives a damn about your profile unless you;re the CEO of Opera.
     
  8. Bribebox

    Bribebox Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    60
    Yeah and I am the Queen of England :18:
     
  9. mogs03

    mogs03 Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    195
    Occupation:
    SEO
    Location:
    Behind you!
    And I am the king! How come I did notice that you are here:drinking2
     
  10. aldis

    aldis Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,326
    Likes Received:
    532
    Occupation:
    CSEO Founder
    Home Page:
    so bad I couldn't neg rep people twice... kid you've got no idea what you're talking about. Read, learn, inform yourself and then come back with useful information.. we don't need your useless posts in here.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  11. rugbyjack2005

    rugbyjack2005 Power Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    The quality of the content was never mentioned. If you create 200 web 2.0s with rubbish quality, the likelihood is they will just get removed. While the search engines can't tell if the content is good or not, site moderators can and they just take it down.
     
  12. apoorv

    apoorv Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    62
    Well, no, Google itself won't be able to tell those apart however, generally, if you spend some time changing things around, the quality of a web 2.0 done manually tends to be better, and to a human eye, that would reflect.

    The other good benefit of it is that these web 2.0s stick for a long time, so if you have a website you see existing for years, I'd take that route. Recently, from all I've seen, sites are dropping *some* rankings if the link churn is high; I wouldn't be surprised if that took off though.
     
  13. RBKing

    RBKing Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2012
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    17
    I know very little but, I agree that too much of anything can be a problem and make your efforts noticed. I think backlink diversity is the key.
     
  14. adam11soccer

    adam11soccer Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Thanks for the posts. How can I use different Ip's if im not using a program to build my web 2.0s? Btw im not using rubbish in my created 2.0s. They are all quality and I dont plan on making 200, maybe like 15.
     
  15. adam11soccer

    adam11soccer Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Bump for some help
     
  16. bilbo

    bilbo Power Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    644
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Occupation:
    an actor on wizard of oz - the 3rd munchkin
    Location:
    middle earth
    bump for help what?

    think your thread has been answered.....or is there more
     
  17. adam11soccer

    adam11soccer Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Sorry my bad. This was my second question

     
  18. 20years

    20years Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2009
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    It will work just fine as long as the content is good and doesn't look overly spammy.
     
  19. Joker7

    Joker7 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    39


    If your planning on making just 15 web 2.0s, find 15 different web 2.0 platforms and you can use 1 IP for all. Google can't see the IP. The IP change is only to prevent the web 2.0 platform from banning you
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  20. adam11soccer

    adam11soccer Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    4
    Thanks alot