1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Court Rules Facebook Messages Protected Under 1st and 4th Amendment

Discussion in 'BlackHat Lounge' started by The Scarlet Pimp, Oct 11, 2012.

  1. The Scarlet Pimp

    The Scarlet Pimp Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    3,120
    Occupation:
    Chair moistener.
    Location:
    Cyberspace
    Court Rules That Student's Facebook Messages Are Protected Under First and Fourth Amendments

    Earlier this month, a U.S. District Court in Minnesota ruled that a student's online privacy is protected under the first and fourth amendments, and any school officials who require the disclosure of a student's password is violating their privacy rights.

    The case concerns a 12-year-old in Minnesota who wrote negative remarks about an employee at her school on her Facebook page.

    She was disciplined by the school for her posts, and the school forced her to hand over the passwords to her Facebook and personal email pages.

    According to the Wall Street Journal, the court ruled that statements made away from school "are protected under the First Amendment and not punishable by school authorities unless they are true threats or are reasonably calculated to reach the school environment and are so egregious as to pose a serious safety risk or other substantial disruption in that environment."

    The ruling has been hailed by experts as a promising first step in guaranteeing privacy rights for online content.

    "Public schools that require any of their students to register their social media usernames, or to provide access to their password protected digital content via required Facebook Friending or the installation of a third-party software application for any reason are in clear violation of the 1st and 4th Amendment," wrote Bradley Shear, an attorney who has helped states deal with issues of privacy and social media.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. Roparadise

    Roparadise BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    1,417
    Wouldn't third party software basically be violating federal and state laws,due it being spyware?
     
  3. DonimusMaximus

    DonimusMaximus Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    I didn't realize 1) that a 12 year old was allowed to have a facebook account and two if constitution can apply to a private website.
     
  4. Roparadise

    Roparadise BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    786
    Likes Received:
    1,417

    It had nothing to do with it being a private website,but the school trying to force a student to gain access to what she said out of school on a non school website.