Copyright fine

Toni Ellis

Newbie
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

One of my clients has received a £4000 fine for using an unlicensed image. This was done before my time with them. When I took over their SEO I built a new website and the image was removed.

Is there anything I can advise them to do? They have been given 5 days to pay.

Thank you
 
Hi all,

One of my clients has received a £4000 fine for using an unlicensed image. This was done before my time with them. When I took over their SEO I built a new website and the image was removed.

Is there anything I can advise them to do? They have been given 5 days to pay.

Thank you

Wait, who give them the fine?
Are you sure is legit?
 
Given the fine is in GBP, I assume your client is in the UK.

Using someone else's copyright is a civil offence, not a criminal offence. So, this is not a fine, its a request from the copyright holder.

In the UK, you can only claim damages - not an amount that is intended to punish the person. Damages have to reflect the economic loss of the copyright holder.

So the first question to ask is why £4,000 and not say £3,998? How did the owner calculate £4,000?

At £4,000, its not really worth taking the case to court because the claimant's lawyers' fees will be more (while the loser might pay the fees of both parties, they also might not, depending on who the client is). So most likely, the claimant is claiming £4,000 and hoping that your client will be scared and therefore pay.

Practically, the best solution is probably for your client to make a counter offer based on what would have been paid had the image been licensed.

If I were you, I wouldn't propose this to your client though. You're not a lawyer and this took place before you became involved. Have them find their own legal advice.
 
Given the fine is in GBP, I assume your client is in the UK.

Using someone else's copyright is a civil offence, not a criminal offence. So, this is not a fine, its a request from the copyright holder.

In the UK, you can only claim damages - not an amount that is intended to punish the person. Damages have to reflect the economic loss of the copyright holder.

So the first question to ask is why £4,000 and not say £3,998? How did the owner calculate £4,000?

At £4,000, its not really worth taking the case to court because the claimant's lawyers' fees will be more (while the loser might pay the fees of both parties, they also might not, depending on who the client is). So most likely, the claimant is claiming £4,000 and hoping that your client will be scared and therefore pay.

Practically, the best solution is probably for your client to make a counter offer based on what would have been paid had the image been licensed.

I were you, I wouldn't propose this to your client though. You're not a lawyer and this took place before you became involved. Have them find their own legal advice.
Thank you!
 
First find out if it is legitimate. If so, your client should pay the money or it could get even worse if they decide to take the matter to court. Here's an example what could happen (this guy who stole Chelsea's image was from Australia.. country doesn't matter)
 
Company called rights control in London. Client seems to think its legit

Your client have provided the image to be posted on website or the company before use it without client knowledge?
If the company provide the image and the client still have some contract, i would tell them fuck off go to this guys.
Still, like other suggested, it may be more expensive to go in court.
If you want to help them, try to dig information about that company and see if it's legit 100%

Good luck
 
Back
Top