DuckingOutstanding
Senior Member
- Dec 22, 2015
- 1,108
- 769
I have a hard time believing that Google wouldn't catch on to an ordinary spinner by now..besides, those are totally fake "short cuts" anyway, the work out to taking as long or longer than just busting it out yoursef....They all seem to work one of two ways (so far as I've seen) either:Make some content spinning before translating your posts.
a) they require you to follow along select from suggested adjectives/adverbs (each one) in order to ensure the final product makes sense,
or
b) the "spun" product is a steaming pile of S*it that is jam packed with incorrect word usages, really poor choice in word substitutions, and in some cases, a spun result that actually means the opposite of what the original point was, or is just a grammatical mess...or is flat out unintelligible gibberish.
In either of those two cases, you are most definitely going to be reading and editing your spun post, most likely making more than one draft revision, and likely rewording parts that weren't spun to befing with....and if you're talking a 500 word blog post - frankly you could likely have just written it yourself in the amount of time it would have taken you to locate the article to spin, let alone factoring in the proofreading aspect into the equation, editing, and final copy gets completed, and by the time you're satisfied that the end result is something that wouldn't be embarrassing/damaging to have your name attached to, you've spent more time effort and resouces on securing content that someone else "wrote for you", sending it through the "spinner", proofreading and correcting it than it would have taken you to write 3 500 word blog posts from scratch...it just seems silly to me - the "Time saver" in this instance will ALWAYS, in reality, be the biggest time waster...