Copy content bad?

If the plugin created unique content or summarized, I would recommend but copied? You wont be able to rank with copied content.
 
Rather than automatically loading them onto your web, they could be queued so that you can select / curate the ones to publish and have some mechanism to add your own comments - what is on your page is your comment followed by a paragraph or two from the source and a link back to it. I've seen this last part done somewhere - I presume they have some kind of queuing mechanism that is behind the scenes.

Would this work for you?

Would it be a way to gain some content without a copy penalty and without having to write entire articles?

Also, would like to know if there are WP plugins / themes with this whole capability, if anyone can point the way.
 
This used to be a good black hat technique years ago. Today it will only hurt your site.
 
This used to be a good black hat technique years ago. Today it will only hurt your site.

My suggestion is don't use the copy content to your site. It will affect your site. Google will not like copied content mate. Use unique content to your site....
Right, not copy.

But, what about the approach I mentioned...it is not an entire copy and it adds comments ("value add"). I've seen it done, but don't know if this also gets flagged as duplicate by Google or as "commentary" since it is "attributed".
 
Coping content is really bad because Google is always there to look for it.
 
Direct Answer is Very Bad. Don't waste your time.
 
Back
Top