Content Lock Pro Vs. Mighty Content Locker
- Thread starter hvp17
- Start date
Furious George
Supreme Member
- Dec 13, 2012
- 1,438
- 2,188
I bought content locker pro, and it's very easy to use/install. they have good support forums as well
I've not used might content locker... it seems to have good reviews.
I've not used might content locker... it seems to have good reviews.
I''m using CLP2 and I'm satisfied with it. It has all you need to make stable money. MCL seems great tool but I haven't used it. Their feature for featuring offers seems great. Also it seems that MCL will allow you to have better stats overview than CLP2. But again, I've never used MCL.
giftedwizard
BANNED
- Mar 2, 2011
- 196
- 96
lol all you need is a good content locker man the only difference is the name's both do the same thing as they were created for the same function dont waste your money on choosing just buy one and be done with it. im didnt even purchase any of the content lockers i've hire a coder to make one personally for me and things been great.
The problem with your question is that unlike some other tools, if you already owned either one of these you had no reason to purchase the other. Outside of people who got early review copies I doubt very many people have owned both of these tools so you chances of getting an answer are pretty slim. Just pick one. choose based on price or flip a coin or something.
jake042
Regular Member
- Jul 24, 2011
- 310
- 94
I have bought CLP 2 because there were no alternatives. But it's a great tool and has great support however atm I would pick mml as it has the same features as CLP. But it also has a lot of new features and better statistics overview. So mml would be my choice now.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
euhero
Regular Member
- Jun 21, 2011
- 270
- 224
I have CLP but I must say MCL is much better because it has bulk import offers. CLP should add this feature because this has prevent me from using the locker, it is a pain adding offers 1 by 1 and wait for it to load when you hit submit.
Just my 2cents though but I still like CLP
Just my 2cents though but I still like CLP
Being someone who is somewhat connected to CLP I decided not to speak up in this thread the first time I saw it, as I firmly believe that input from users is much more valuable than anything the product owners themselves say, but having noticed that the owner of Mighty Content Locker (albeit now banned - not sure if it's connected to MCL or not) has spoken up, I decided to do the same just quickly.
I just wanted to say that those saying that MCL has more features are absolutely correct. There are things in MCL that are missing from CLP - mainly because any new features added to CLP are always heavily tested in-house before they are released to the public, as only by doing this can CLP guarantee stability and provide top notch support.
But with that said, in my book CLP's most important advantage over any competitor is the fact that due to the large user base (over 2,000 CLP users) there are a ton of third party add-ons / snippets being shared in its private members area, meaning that almost any problem can be easily solved and any additional feature that is needed can be added using add-ons.
We realise that CLP has somewhat of a learning curve, though, and that's because when we first created the Version 1 of CLP a couple of years ago it was mainly for us to use on our own content locking sites, rather than for selling it publicly, and as such the main focus was always creating something that would help make most money, rather than something that is easy on the eye. We quickly realised that this was somewhat an issue, but instead of making CLP "look pretty" at the expense of losing some of the core functionality, we decided to offer a level of customer support that is unparalleled in the industry. And so far I think it has worked out great - we've had some competitors come and go but people still stick with CLP as they know that they'll get a working product and more importantly, they know that they will be helped out should they have any issues.
Even though I'm no longer too actively involved in CLP, I know that this (along with a bunch of other features - some that MCL offers and others that no competitors offer) is already being planned and there will soon be a brand new version of CLP out there, and in all likelihood the upgrade from v2 to v3 will be free, similarly to how we ran the upgrade from v1 to v2.
But as I said - I'm hoping more actual users (of both CLP and MCL) will jump on the thread and comment as the input that users provide is obviously much more valuable than whatever myself, the current owners of CLP or the owner of MCL says.
Bryan
I just wanted to say that those saying that MCL has more features are absolutely correct. There are things in MCL that are missing from CLP - mainly because any new features added to CLP are always heavily tested in-house before they are released to the public, as only by doing this can CLP guarantee stability and provide top notch support.
But with that said, in my book CLP's most important advantage over any competitor is the fact that due to the large user base (over 2,000 CLP users) there are a ton of third party add-ons / snippets being shared in its private members area, meaning that almost any problem can be easily solved and any additional feature that is needed can be added using add-ons.
We realise that CLP has somewhat of a learning curve, though, and that's because when we first created the Version 1 of CLP a couple of years ago it was mainly for us to use on our own content locking sites, rather than for selling it publicly, and as such the main focus was always creating something that would help make most money, rather than something that is easy on the eye. We quickly realised that this was somewhat an issue, but instead of making CLP "look pretty" at the expense of losing some of the core functionality, we decided to offer a level of customer support that is unparalleled in the industry. And so far I think it has worked out great - we've had some competitors come and go but people still stick with CLP as they know that they'll get a working product and more importantly, they know that they will be helped out should they have any issues.
Even though I'm no longer too actively involved in CLP, I know that this (along with a bunch of other features - some that MCL offers and others that no competitors offer) is already being planned and there will soon be a brand new version of CLP out there, and in all likelihood the upgrade from v2 to v3 will be free, similarly to how we ran the upgrade from v1 to v2.
But as I said - I'm hoping more actual users (of both CLP and MCL) will jump on the thread and comment as the input that users provide is obviously much more valuable than whatever myself, the current owners of CLP or the owner of MCL says.
Bryan
Last edited:
I purchased CLP pro v2 on friday..30/9 but I couldnt get it to run because I was not given the serial no. To proceed with the installation. To make matters worse I didnt get any reply or support from them on the contact email and in this forum.hence I decided to get my money back.
Im definitely going to give mighty locker a go..I hope their support dont screw up too..
own007
Regular Member
- May 15, 2009
- 252
- 36
Don't buy neither. both aren't responsive and can't detect mobile devices, so the desktop and mobile CPA offers mix. both support is'nt working anymore. Both can't blank referral URL efficiently. if anybody know about another solution i will be happy to hear about it....
