Do affiliate networks generally care about link cloaking? I know some of them aren't big fans of iframing, and when generating cloaked links I saw a lot of "frame" tags.
Is this different then iframing, and what's the networks stand points?
Here is an example of my code:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 FRAMESET//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Welcome</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<FRAMESET ROWS="100%">
<FRAME SRC="www.affiliatelink.com">
<NOFRAMES>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Welcome</TITLE>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" CONTENT="0; URL='www.affiliatelink.com'">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P>Your browser does not seem to support frames or frame support has been disabled.</P>
<P>Please <A HREF="www.affiliatelink.com">click here</A> to proceed to the site.</P>
</BODY>
</NOFRAMES>
</FRAMESET>
</HTML>
Is this different then iframing, and what's the networks stand points?
Here is an example of my code:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 FRAMESET//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Welcome</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<FRAMESET ROWS="100%">
<FRAME SRC="www.affiliatelink.com">
<NOFRAMES>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Welcome</TITLE>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="REFRESH" CONTENT="0; URL='www.affiliatelink.com'">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P>Your browser does not seem to support frames or frame support has been disabled.</P>
<P>Please <A HREF="www.affiliatelink.com">click here</A> to proceed to the site.</P>
</BODY>
</NOFRAMES>
</FRAMESET>
</HTML>
